SU(2)L, SU(2)R, other symmetric groups and SSB

  • Thread starter Thread starter Anne-Sylvie
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Groups Symmetric
Anne-Sylvie
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone,

When we speak about the SU(2)L group (in electroweak interactions for example), about what group do we talk ? What is the difference with the SU(2) group ? And with the SU(2)R ? Why is the label so important ?

I ask this because I see that a Lagrangien can be invariant under SU(2)L x SU(2)R. I think that means that if we apply any transformation of the SU(2)L and then SU(2)R on the lagrangien, it will give the same lagrangien as before. Is it right ?
Then, when we consider the Higgs mechanism. There is an non zero expectation value, and then via the spontaneous symmetry breaking mechanism, a higgs field appear, etc, and we have another lagrangien. This lagrangien is no longer invariant under SU(2)L x SU(2)R transformations, but well under SU(2)L+R. What does that mean ? What is SU(2)L+R ? How can we know, when we spontaneously break a symmetry, which symmetries will survive ?

I'm a bit confused with all of that. I hope I'm relatively clear in my message... Please excuse me for my English but I'm non native and I'm still learning this usefull langage. :-)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
See chapters 83, 88, and 89 in the book by Srednicki (draft version freely downloadable at his web page).
 
Thanks for your advice. :-)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...
Back
Top