Sublimation of Graphite: Understanding the Process and Its Significance

AI Thread Summary
Sublimation of graphite involves the transition of solid carbon to gas, represented by the equation C(s) → C(g). While sublimation is typically considered a physical change that overcomes intermolecular forces, graphite is unique as it consists of covalent bonds within its structure. The discussion clarifies that during sublimation, these covalent bonds are not broken; rather, the process highlights the nature of graphite's bonding. The correct answer to the multiple-choice question is D, as it acknowledges the special case of graphite in sublimation. Understanding this distinction is crucial for grasping the significance of the sublimation process in relation to covalent bonding.
RoboNerd
Messages
410
Reaction score
11

Homework Statement



Multiple choice:[/B]
In which of the following processes are covalent bonds broken?
a) solid sodium chlroide melts
b) bronze melts
c) sucrose dissolves in water
d) solid carbon graphite sublimes
e) solid carbon dioxide sublimes

Homework Equations


none

The Attempt at a Solution


D is the correct answer according to my prep book, but I do not understand why this is true.

I think that sublimation is a physical change and like all physical changes we are overcoming intermolecular forces, not breaking intramolecular bonds. How is D thus true for graphite then?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There are no intermolecular forces in graphite. It is in a way a special case. Sublimation is just

C(s) → C(g)

but in solid C atoms are covalently bonded.
 
  • Like
Likes RoboNerd
Hmm. That is a very interesting thing to think about. Thanks so much for clarifying!
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
22K
Replies
14
Views
4K
Back
Top