Substituting NaOH for Ca(OH)2 in Buffering Capacity Experiment: Will it Work?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on substituting NaOH for Ca(OH)2 in a soil buffering capacity experiment. The original calculation for the equivalent amount of NaOH needed is confirmed to be correct at 0.8 g per liter, based on the required concentration of hydroxide ions. Participants clarify that 34% of the Ca(OH)2 contributes to the hydroxide ions, leading to the conclusion that the substitution will yield the same buffering capacity. The consensus is that using NaOH instead of Ca(OH)2 should work effectively for soil analysis. Overall, the substitution is deemed valid for the experiment's needs.
iross75
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



We are doing a experiement where we are testing the buffering capacity of soils. The text says to use Ca(OH)2, but we only have NaOH, which i plan to substitute. I just wanted to check that the solution i make up will have the equivalent OH.


Homework Equations


making up 0.01M solution of Ca(OH)2 which is 0.07g per litre

Of that 0.34g is OH 0.07 x 34/70

Therefore the equialent NaOH would be 0.8g per litre

0.34g *40/14


Would this be correct??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
By inspection your answer is way off. You are saying that of the 0.07 grams of Ca(OH)2 present in a liter that 0.34 grams of that is due to the counterion, OH? How can you have 0.34 grams out of only 0.07 grams?
 
Damn...its not 0.34g is is 34%.

34% of the 0.07g is from the OH.
 
Are you familiar with the concept of moles and equivalents?
 
Learnt the concepts a long time ago, have been a microbiologist for the last decade, and have now moved into an area where chemistry is required.
 
Ahh, great! You want 0.01 moles per liter of Ca(OH)2 which is 0.02 equivalents of OH- per liter. To get that from NaOH you need (0.02moles/L OH-) X (40 g NaOH/mole) which is 0.8 g/L NaOH... same answer as yours.

Do you think the replacement will work in soils analysis?
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top