Sum of a series resulting in a logarithm

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving a mathematical series involving double summation that results in a logarithmic expression. The subject area includes series convergence and properties of logarithms.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to manipulate the left-hand side of the equation to transform it into a different summation form but encounters difficulties. Some participants suggest considering the meaning of summations and integrals, while others provide hints related to logarithmic identities and transformations.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, offering hints and discussing potential transformations. There is a recognition of the need to adhere to forum rules regarding the posting of solutions, and some participants express uncertainty about their approaches.

Contextual Notes

There are references to specific transformations and assumptions about the summation indices, indicating that participants are questioning the setup and structure of the problem. Additionally, there is mention of the forum's rules against providing complete solutions, which influences the nature of the guidance offered.

Heirot
Messages
145
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Prove: \sum_{i=1}^{\infty}\sum_{j=1}^{i-1} \frac{(-1)^i}{i j}=\frac{1}{2}\ln^2 2

Homework Equations



\ln 2 = \sum_{i=1}^{\infty} \frac{(-1)^{i+1}}{i}

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm trying to manipulate the l.h.s. of the problem to transform it into \frac{1}{2}\sum_{i=1}^{\infty}\sum_{j=1}^{\infty} \frac{(-1)^{i+j}}{i j} but I just can't seem to get it.

Any suggestions will be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I could give you the solution or I could give you a hint. Let me give you the hint first. The hint is:
log (1+x) = x -x^2/2 + x^3/3 - x^4/4 + x^5/5.. (ad nauseum to infinity)= $\int \frac{1}{1+x}dx$.

Substituting $x=1$ gives you your Eq. 2. You seem to have been thinking only symbolically so far, and that's why you are at wit's end. Now try thinking about what summations over variables really mean.

In your question, you have two summations, or alternatively two integrals; one in a dummy variable (let's call it $r$), the other in $x$. Remember that summations are discrete representations of integrals (with dx=a unit step).

$int \frac{1}{1+x}\left[ \int^{x} \frac{1}{1-r}dr \right] dx$

There's a mistake in the above equation for you to take note of but you should have sufficient direction to move forward. So you might ask how can we take the $\frac{(-1)^i}{i}$ out of the term... that's only because $\sum_j$ does not affect $i$, so it's effectively a constant under that summation. Also look up the term 'dilogarithms'.

I will post the solution after I get to work, which should be around two hours from now, unless there's dead deers or rednecks blocking the traffic.
 
Last edited:
sshzp4 said:
I will post the solution after I get to work, which should be around two hours from now, unless there's dead deers or rednecks blocking the traffic.
You should review the forum rules. Posting solutions isn't allowed here.
 
vela said:
You should review the forum rules. Posting solutions isn't allowed here.

Thanks vela. I wasn't aware of that.

Okay Heirot. You are on your own there now. The final hints:
1. You need to use the transform $j=r+1$. (You might want to check if the i-1 on top of your second summation sign in your Eq. 1, it is likely that that could be a i+1 instead). By no means is this the only transform that you use.

2. You end up with an integral expression that is expressed in terms of itself. I don't know the technical descriptor for this. eg. $I_n= -\frac{n!}{(n-1)!}\sin^n(x) \cos(x) -nI_n$ where $n$ is a constant and $I_n$ is the integral equation. Then you can solve the whole thing and substitute $x=1$ to get the final solution and then go and watch a movie.

(I am too lazy/find it intellectually abhorrent to read anything that can be described as 'rules of behavior', my personal failing obviously.)
 
Oh, I see, this can't be proven the way I was doing it. Thanks for your help!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K