Sum of non-identical non-central Chi-square random variables.

no999
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hi All,

By definition, the sum of iid non-central chi-square RVs is non-central chi-square. what is the sum of ono-identical non-central chi-square RV.

I have a set of non zero mean complex Gaussian random variables H_i with a mean m_i and variance σ_i . i=1...N. H
the result of their square is non-central chi-square RM. Now what is the distribution of the sum of those non-central chi-square RV given that their variances are different "i.e., they are independent but non-identical distributed".

Kind Regards
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I am also very much interested in the answer. Anyone know the answer??

Thanks
 
It is easy to write down an expression for the distribution, e.g. using the characteristic functions of the individual distributions.

kdl05, this is quite an old thread. Hence it would be useful if you could specify the question you are interested in. So if ##X_i~N(\mu_i,\sigma_i)##, the original poster seemed to be intereste in the distribution of ##\sum_i X_i^2##, which is not distributed as a non-central chi square. What is chi square distributed is ##\sum_i (X_i/\sigma_i)^2##.
 
Last edited:
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.
Back
Top