Sum of the first n natural numbers is n(n+1)/2

StephenPrivitera
Messages
360
Reaction score
0
We know that the sum of the first n natural numbers is n(n+1)/2

Can we express the product of the first n natural numbers without using the factorial symbol?
It is possible to write a factorial as a sum. Any idea what it would look like?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
To my knowledge, there isn't any convenient way.

You can do a "cheap" conversion from a product to a sum, though:

ln Πf(n) = Σln f(n)

So for factorials:

ln(n!) = Σln n
or
n! = eΣln n
 
Another way to write a factorial as a sum (which, I admit, sounds like cheating) is to use the Gamma function.

n! = Gamma(n+1) = Integral(tx-1e-t)dt

(the integral goes from zero to infinity)

Since an integral is the limit of a sum, it is kinda what you wanted.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top