Sum of Two Squares: Intro to Number Theory

matqkks
Messages
280
Reaction score
5
Why bother writing a given integer as the sum of two squares? Does this have any practical application? Is there an introduction on a first year number theory course which would motivate students to study the conversion of a given integer to sums of two squares?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
There is a good deal of material. For instance the corollary to a theorem of Fermat :- "Any prime ##p## of the form ##4k+1## can be represented uniquely as the sum of 2 squares. Or (related) Lagrange's theorem:- "Any positive integer ##n## can be written as the sum of 4 squares, some of which may be 0".
Then there are also many interesting properties of ##r_2(n)## where ##r## is the sum of squares function.
I would recommend you research "representations of integers as sums of squares."
 
matqkks said:
Why bother writing a given integer as the sum of two squares? Does this have any practical application?

It most likely does not. There are applications of number theory, but overall you should take the class mainly because you find it interesting, not because of possible applications.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top