I Summation for extended binomial coefficients

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding a way to express the extended binomial coefficients through summation for the polynomial expansion of (1+x+x^2+...+x^N)^M. The multinomial theorem is suggested as a useful tool for deriving the coefficients of x^j without manual expansion. A specific formula is provided, which involves setting variables to x^i and simplifying the notation to identify coefficients. Additionally, an example using 2^n is mentioned to illustrate how substituting x=1 can provide insights into the coefficients. Overall, the conversation emphasizes leveraging established mathematical theorems to achieve the desired results efficiently.
Astudious
Messages
61
Reaction score
0
Is there a way of writing summation(s) to obtain the extended binomial coefficients?

i.e., Considering the expansion of (1+x+x^2+x^3+...+x^N)^M

can we write expressions (presumably involving summation and/or product notation) for the coefficients (on x^j in the expansion of the above, for each integer j from j=0 to j=NM, i.e. each of the NM+1 non-0 coefficients) without expanding the polynomial by hand?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi, you can use the formula

##(x_{0}+\cdots +x_{N})^{M}=\sum_{\alpha_{0}+\ldots +\alpha_{N}=M}\frac{N!}{\alpha_{0}!\cdots \alpha_{N}! }x_{0}^{\alpha_{0}}\cdots x_{N}^{\alpha_{N}}##

now setting ##x_{i}=x^{i}## for every ##i=0,...,N## you obtain the expansion and you can see if it is possible to simplify the index notation in order to find the coefficients ...
 
I can at least start you in a direction that might take you where you want to go:

Consider <br /> 2^{n}=(1+1)^{n}=\sum_{k=0}^{n}\begin{pmatrix}<br /> n \\<br /> k\\<br /> \end{pmatrix}1^{n-k}1^{k}=\sum_{k=0}^{n}\begin{pmatrix}<br /> n \\<br /> k\\<br /> \end{pmatrix}<br />. Thus, putting x=1 in your formula would give you a start?
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top