Summation of 1/p: Logarithmic Growth of N

Dragonfall
Messages
1,023
Reaction score
5
\sum_{p\leq N}\frac{1}{p}=\log\log N + A + O(\frac{1}{\log N})

Does it mean that we can simply replace the O part with a function that is a constant times 1/(log N)? What would be the difference between A + O(\frac{1}{\log N}) and O(1)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Dragonfall said:
Does it mean that we can simply replace the O part with a function that is a constant times 1/(log N)?

No it doesn't. If f(n)=g(n)+O(h(n)) then there is a constant C where |f(n)-g(n)|<=C*h(n) in some suitable range of n. It does NOT mean f(n)=g(n)+C*h(n). Consider cos(x)=O(1) but we don't have cos(x)=constant.

Dragonfall said:
What would be the difference between A + O(\frac{1}{\log N}) and O(1)?

The first gives more information (it implies the second but not vice versa). Even if you don't know the constant A (it can be expressed in terms of an infinite sum over the primes here though) it still says something about the structure of the lower order terms.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top