thedemon13666
- 18
- 0
i had to do a study using a summing amplifier to see if the results i got agreed with theory, the answers i got was something like 9.62, the answer i should of got was 10, now this doesn't seem that far away, BUT the errors didnt agree at all, they only agreed within 4 standard errors, so i was looking for a reason why they may not have agreed.
My orginial thought was that:
The summing amplifiers summing equation made an assumption that the current inside of the op am was 0 and as a result wud overestimate the summed voltage.
I spoke to my instructer and he said it would be negligable.
So i don't really have a reason why
The theory equation is
Vout = -(\frac{Rf}{R1}V1 + \frac{Rf}{R2}V2)
the measured value i get is -(9.620±0.005)V
the expected value i get is -(10.00±0.01)V
as you can see they only agree within 4 standard errors of each other.
Im a bit stumped at a reason why
My orginial thought was that:
The summing amplifiers summing equation made an assumption that the current inside of the op am was 0 and as a result wud overestimate the summed voltage.
I spoke to my instructer and he said it would be negligable.
So i don't really have a reason why
The theory equation is
Vout = -(\frac{Rf}{R1}V1 + \frac{Rf}{R2}V2)
the measured value i get is -(9.620±0.005)V
the expected value i get is -(10.00±0.01)V
as you can see they only agree within 4 standard errors of each other.
Im a bit stumped at a reason why