Sums of Legendre Symbols Question

doubleaxel195
Messages
46
Reaction score
0
Proposition:

\sum_{i=0}^{p-1} (\frac{i^2+a}{p})=-1 for any odd prime p and any integer a. (I am referring to the Legendre Symbol).

I was reading a paper where they claimed it was true for the a=1 case and referred to a source that I don't have immediate access to. So I was wondering if anyone knows if this is true or a source that talks about this? I know it doesn't mean it's necessarily true, but this proposition has been true with all the examples I've looked at with Mathematica. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nevermind, I found this in the exercises of Ireland and Rosen on page 63. Just thought I would post where I found it in case anyone else needs to know.
 
In your formula, the integer a should not be zero, because

\sum_{i=0}^{p-1} (\frac{i^2}{p})=p-1

(Note: (\frac{0}{p}) = 0 for p > 2 and
(\frac{x^2}{p})= 1 for gcd(x,p)=1)
 
Last edited:
RamaWolf said:
In your formula, the integer a should not be zero, because

\sum_{i=0}^{p-1} (\frac{i^2}{p})=p-1

(Note: (\frac{0}{p}) = 0 for p > 2 and
(\frac{x^2}{p})= 1 for gcd(x,p)=1)



Even if the integer is zero modulo p the formula works, since \,p-1=-1\pmod p

DonAntonio
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top