Superconducting Magnetic Energy Storage (SMES)

AI Thread Summary
Superconducting Magnetic Energy Storage (SMES) devices are primarily used to manage short power interruptions and enhance grid efficiency, but they are not typically designed to function as backup power sources like generators during outages. While SMES systems can store significant amounts of energy, they do require energy for refrigeration to maintain superconducting temperatures, which is a critical operational factor. Energy loss in SMES is minimal due to the lack of resistance, although there is a slow decay of the magnetic field over time due to residual resistance in the superconducting windings. Additionally, SMES devices do not require a ramp-up period to reach field strength, allowing for immediate energy discharge when needed. Overall, SMES technology offers efficient energy storage solutions with specific operational characteristics that differentiate it from traditional backup power systems.
MattR
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
I cam across SMES (Superconducting Magnetic Energy Storage) while researching superconducting and had a few questions I'm hoping to have answered.

1. I have read that SMES devices are primary used in the event for short interruptions in power, and aiding in efficiency in the power grid. Can a SMES device be used like a back up battery in the event of a power outage similar to a back up generator kicking in? Considering some can hold MWH worth of energy I would think that if power went out the SMES device could kick in and provide the back up power needed until it was depleted or the power was restored.

2. Since SMES use superconducting in a way similar to an MRI (superconducting loop) to create a magnetic field to store energy do they loose any of that energy? If so, how much and over what time frame.

3. Do SMES devices need to be ramp-up, again similar to an MRI to reach a field strength or is that irreverent?

thanks for the help,
Matt R.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF Matt. We prefer it if you include a link to what you have been reading. Please post the link before we answer.
 
MattR said:
Since SMES use superconducting in a way similar to an MRI (superconducting loop) to create a magnetic field to store energy do they loose any of that energy? If so, how much and over what time frame.
They do not lose energy; there is no resistance. However, it does require energy for the refrigeration to keep them at superconducting temperatures.
 
anorlunda said:
Welcome to PF Matt. We prefer it if you include a link to what you have been reading. Please post the link before we answer.

Sure no problem.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superconducting_magnet#Persistent_mode
Go down until persistent mode. The end of that paragraph reads:

"The winding current, and the magnetic field, will not actually persist forever, but will decay slowly according to a normal inductive (L/R) time constant:
H ( t ) = H 0 e − ( R / L ) t
where R is a small residual resistance in the superconducting wingdings due to joints or a phenomenon called flux motion resistance. Nearly all commercial superconducting magnets are equipped with persistent switches."

SMES links:
https://www.windpowerengineering.com/electrical/power-storage/say-hello-smes-superconducting-magnetic-energy-storage-system/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superconducting_magnetic_energy_storage
https://www.technologyreview.com/s/423227/superconducting-magnets-for-grid-scale-storage/
 
  • Like
Likes anorlunda
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.
Back
Top