Superconductor Ginzburg-Landau model

vidi
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Why is it that for a superconductor \alpha<0,\beta>0 in the Ginzburg-Landau model wit free energy formulation
E=\int d^3x\,\, \frac{\vec B^2}{2\mu}+\frac{1}{2m}|(-i\hbar\nabla-e\vec A)\psi|^2+\alpha|\psi|^2+\beta|\psi|^4

Homework Equations



E=\int d^3x\,\, \frac{\vec B^2}{2\mu}+\frac{1}{2m}|(-i\hbar\nabla-e\vec A)\psi|^2+\alpha|\psi|^2+\beta|\psi|^4

The Attempt at a Solution



I have no idea how to start! perhaps it has to do with some critical temperature?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
\beta >0, otherwise the free energy could be minimized by |\psi |\rightarrow \infty. This may not be obviously unphysical, but the Ginzburg-Landau model does after all aim to model the phase transition around |\psi |=0.

\alpha <0, then. The parameter \alpha is indeed related to the critical temperature, but you don't need to look at the temperature dependence here. Just consider the simpler case with \vec{A}=0 and \nabla \psi \approx 0 and minimize the free energy. This will give you the sign. Of course, you'll probably have to extend the arguments a bit, to account for the inhomogeneous case and non-zero vector potentials, but that's the basic idea anyway.
 
Thanks, Hypersphere.
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top