Superconductors and Fermi surfaces

Niles
Messages
1,834
Reaction score
0
Hi

The dispersion of Bogolyubov quasiparticles in a d-wave superconductor is

<br /> <br /> E(\mathbf k) = \pm \sqrt{\varepsilon (\mathbf k)^2+\Delta (\mathbf k)^2},<br />

where ε(k) is the normal-state dispersion and ∆(k) is the gap dispersion. My question is: The Fermi surface (FS) of the normal state is just ε(k). Is this also the FS of the superconductor?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Superconducting states (i.e. BCS) are not Fermi balls, and so don't have Fermi surfaces.
 
Thanks for replying. I don't quite understand; at low temperatures, the electrons at the FS become unstable, and join in Cooper pairs to reduce energy. Then how can the BCS state not have a FS?

Again, thanks. I really appreciate it.
 
Hi Niles,

The Fermi surface in an interacting system may be defined in terms of a discontinuity in the electron occupation number n_k in momentum space. For free electrons this discontinuity is one while for interacting electrons in a Fermi liquid this discontinuity is less than one. In an s-wave superconductor there is no longer this discontinuity because the qausiparticle energies no longer touch zero i.e. E_k = \epsilon_k - \mu is replaced by E_k = \pm \sqrt{(\epsilon_k - \mu)^2 + \Delta^2}. The original Fermi surface is smeared on the energy scale of \Delta. However, sometimes people refer to the surface of minimum gap in momentum space as the "Fermi surface," and this surface tracks the original Fermi surface in many cases, but they are strictly speaking different concepts.

Hope this helps.
 
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top