Superluminal motion. How's that possible?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of superluminal motion and its compatibility with the theory of relativity. While special relativity states that nothing can travel faster than the speed of light, it is noted that the universe's expansion allows galaxies to recede from each other at effective speeds greater than light due to the stretching of space itself. Examples are provided, such as light beams and jets from galaxies, which may appear to travel faster than light but do not violate relativity since they do not involve matter or information moving faster than light locally. The conversation also touches on quantum entanglement and the relativistic addition of velocities, reinforcing that while certain phenomena can seem superluminal, they do not contradict established physical laws. Understanding these concepts requires careful consideration of the definitions of movement versus travel and the nature of light and space.
  • #51
Dickfore said:
Tachyons (from Greek takhus = swift) are particles considered from a purely theoretical point of view
Actually, as previously mentioned, they're not even theoretical; they're hypothetical. There is really no reason to even suppose they might exist. It is simply that they do not violate relativity.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #52
DaveC426913 said:
Actually, as previously mentioned, they're not even theoretical; they're hypothetical. There is really no reason to even suppose they might exist. It is simply that they do not violate relativity.

As much as I read, there are theoretical reasons to suppose their existence in some theoretical models. Thus, 'theoretical' = 'hypothetical' as long as those models are just hypotheses.
 
  • #53
Well.. I was presenting a hypothetical situ.. Anyway... thanks a lot everyone...for your guidance and patience.
And yes I am clear that my assumption was wrong (about the two bodies moving at 0.9c relating to 1.8c).. and I will do the reading required to make me understand the same.
You needn't discuss the hypothetical case as (well it is hypothetical and) it has been discussed in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Tachyon04s.gif
And I understand that the discussion on that is hypothetical and does not prove their existence as such. And my knowledge on this is very menial or non-existence... ;)
Well thanks a lot... take care...
 
Back
Top