Superluminal propagation of fields

Jesus
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I am reading about the Velo-Zwanziger problem in which particles with spin higher than 1 propagates faster than light when the particles are coupled with an electromagnetic field.

In the original paper: G. Velo and D. Zwanziger, “Propagation And Quantization Of Rarita-Schwinger Waves In An External Electromagnetic Potential,” Phys. Rev. 186, 1337 (1969) the authors, to study the causal properties of the equation of motion for spin 3/2 particles coupled with electromagnetic field, use the "method of characteristic determinant" in which they replaces i∂μ with nμ , the normal to the characteristic hypersurfaces, in the highest-derivative terms of the equation of motion.

According to them the determinant ∆(n) of the resulting coefficient matrix determines the causal properties of the system: if the algebraic equation ∆(n) = 0 has real solutions for n0 for any ⃗n, the system is hyperbolic, with maximum wave speed n0/|⃗n|. On the other hand, if there are time-like solutions nμ for ∆(n) = 0, the system admits faster-than-light propagation.

My doubt about this is that I don't understand why can be faster-than-light propagation in the second case. If a partial differential equation is not hyperbolic does that meas that there can be faster-than-light propagation of waves?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Jesus said:
If a partial differential equation is not hyperbolic does that meas that there can be faster-than-light propagation of waves?

Sort of. See the third paragraph at the top of this Wikipedia page:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperbolic_partial_differential_equation

It contrasts hyperbolic PDEs with elliptic and parabolic PDEs; the first of these has a "limiting velocity" of propagation of disturbances, the others don't. But this "propagation of disturbances" may or may not correspond to "faster-than-light propagation of waves"; it depends on the specific PDE and what it's being used to describe.

I don't have access to the paper you refer to, so I can't say how the PDEs are classified there; but the general comment about PDEs in the Wikipedia page is valid.
 
  • Like
Likes Jesus
ok, thank you for respond.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...
Back
Top