Supermeshes and Dependent Current Sources: Determining the Constraint EQ

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around confusion regarding the application of mesh analysis and the determination of constraint equations involving supermeshes and dependent current sources. The user struggles with understanding the signs of the currents in the equations presented, particularly how to derive the correct relationships between loop currents and branch currents. They initially misinterpret the direction of the currents, leading to incorrect equations. Clarification is provided that the sum of the loop currents must equal the actual current flowing in the branch, emphasizing the need to consider current directions carefully. Ultimately, the discussion highlights the importance of systematically analyzing current flow to accurately formulate constraint equations in mesh analysis.
Saladsamurai
Messages
3,009
Reaction score
7

Homework Statement



I am doing some review and I though that I had this down pat, but I am getting confused a little. I am looking at the Wikipedia on Mesh Analysis.

I do not understand the last equation of each section. How are they getting the signs of the currents?

In the top image it looks like i1 flows down the middle branch, is flows up the middle branch, and i2 flows up the middle branch, so I would have said that i2 + is = i1 but that is wrong.

In a similar manner, I get the equation in the second diagram wrong too!

Where is my thinking flawed? How can systematically determine the contraint equation no matter what way the currents are directed?


Screenshot2011-04-04at113924PM.png


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mesh_analysis#Supermesh"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, I guess my logic does work for the dependent source in the bottom example, but not for the current source...

any thoughts?
 
In the first example, i1 and i2 are the loop currents. is is the actual current flowing in a branch. That means that the sum of i1 and i2 in that branch must be is.

Since i2 flows in the same direction as is, you write: is = i2 - i1
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top