Superposition principle and information

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of superposition in wave physics, specifically questioning how information about the shapes of individual waves is preserved during superposition. It emphasizes that while the individual waves may not be visually distinguishable at the moment of superposition, they still exist in a mathematical sense, similar to how numbers can combine without losing their original identities. The analogy of apples is used to illustrate that while the sum of waves appears as a single entity, the original waves' characteristics are not lost but rather represented in the resultant wave's properties. The conversation also touches on the idea that particles involved in the wave do not retain information about the original waveforms, raising further questions about the storage of this information in complex wave interactions. Ultimately, the discussion highlights the intricate relationship between wave behavior and information retention in physics.
Virous
Messages
68
Reaction score
0
I have a question about, perhaps, GCSE level physics, if not below, which, for some reason, is not explained anywhere I've looked up. Or, at least, I didn't find any explanation.

img003.jpg
The picture above is supposed to explain the concept of superposition. It depicts a pair of one-dimensional waves (wave pulses) at 5 different points in time. On the third picture (the exact moment of superposition), the initial individual waves do not exist. Instead we have a single large wave, composed of the energy of both. Where is the information about the shapes of the initial waves at this moment of time stored?

In other words, after the third picture, how does this large wave "know" how it should split in order to restore the initial pulses?

Thank you!
 
Science news on Phys.org
Virous said:
On the third picture (the exact moment of superposition), the initial individual waves do not exist.
I think that's where your problem lies. Both waveforms DO exist at that point exactly as they do exist at every other point on the graph, it's just that you are looking at the sum.

If you had a basket of 3 apples and you added 2 more apples, you wouldn't be thinking "damn, where did my 3 apples go? How can I get them out again?" but because the waveforms add in a smooth way, if you ONLY look at the waveform at that point in time, you can't tell what the individual waves look like, whereas with the apples you don't have that problem.
 
The apple example would make sense, since apples are composed of different matter (I mean, each apple has its own). The problem with waves, though, is that they are all made of the same matter (the same rope in this case, or whatever that is). So a wave is just a distribution of a particular property (in this case the displacement) in space/time.

When you add two numbers (e.g. 3 and 2) you get 5. If you give 5 to another person, he wouldn't be able to tell, if the original numbers were 4 and 1 or 3 and 2 or 2.5 and 2.5 and so on. This is exactly the same case :)

If you think of it in terms of particles, on the third picture one of the particles is "up" and it is ready to go down. How is that possible that when it goes down it gives unequal amounts of energy to absolutely identical particles on its left and right?

If I were to predict what's going to happen after, I would say that the resulting waves after the superposition would be equal. Yet, all the diagrams draw them in this way, so I'm confused.
 
phinds said:
Both waveforms DO exist at that point exactly
If the diagram depicts a real situation, they obviously do :) The question is, where? Particles definitely don't have this information, since they are just particles moving up and down and having a particular displacement function.

Suppose, I have managed to superimpose a million of waves with strange shapes (I guess I would need more dimensions, but anyway). Where will all this information go?
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
Back
Top