Supporting spring, object, top spring problem.

  • Thread starter Thread starter mechdesignron
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Spring
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a spring system where an object is supported by two sets of springs, with the goal of determining how far the object will fall (delta) when a weight (FW) is applied. The initial formula presented for delta was found to be incorrect, as increasing the compressed distance of a spring does not increase its stiffness, according to Hooke's Law. Instead, the correct relationship shows that the distance the object drops is solely dependent on the spring constants (k1, k2) and the weight (FW), not on the preload compression. The clarification of terms such as N1 and N2, and the definition of delta, helped refine the understanding of the system. Ultimately, the conclusion is that the drop distance is influenced only by the spring constants and the applied weight.
mechdesignron
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
FW+(Spring Force 2)K2N2(D2-Delta)

(spring force 1)K1N1(D1+Delta)

I have a spring set(springs in parallel) on top of an object and a spring set supporting the object. The weight of the object is represented by FW. The bottom springs are F1 and the top springs F2. There is preload on the springs, represented by D1 & D2 repectively. I want to know how far the object will fall (Delta) in the given system.

I came up with this formula.

FW+K2N2(D2-delta)=K1N1(D1+delta)

Some magic algebra and Presto:

delta=(FW+K2*N2*D2-K1*N1*D1)/(K1*N1+K2*N2)

OK my problem. It doesn't seem to work. I plugged this into my handy-dandy spreadsheet and when I change the K value-keeping them both the same- it works fine. The higher the K the less the object falls. but when I change the compressed distance -keeping them both the same-, (which should, by hooks Law make the spring stiffer), does not change the distance the object moves. Please help.

Thank you
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Clarify a couple of points, please.

What are N1 and N2?

What do you mean by "fall"?

What is delta?

How did you arrive at your equation? It might be a good idea if you would put your full development process in a post so that I can see how you got here.
 
mechdesignron: Assuming no coils touch, increasing the compressed distance of a linear elastic spring does not increase its stiffness. Instead, by Hooke's law, the force on the spring increases, not its stiffness.

I will call the spring constants of your two spring sets k1 and k2. Although you do not say what N1 and N2 are, we see from your formulation that k1 = K1*N1, and k2 = K2*N2. The equation in the middle of your post is correct. However, we know from equilibrium before Fw is added, k1*D1 = k2*D2. Substituting this into your middle equation, the equation simplifies to Fw - k2*delta = k1*delta. Solving for delta gives delta = Fw/(k1 + k2), which is exactly the result expected. In other words, no amount of preload compression (if your spring coils do not touch) changes the distance an added object drops (delta). The only way to change the distance the object drops is by changing k1, k2, and/or Fw. Your observed results are correct.
 
Thank You nvn

It looks like nvn has awnsered my question but I will clarify to both clean up the post.
The top "equation" is an attempt at a free body diagram with the underline representing the supported object. N=number of springs, by fall I mean delta (the amount an object moves).
 
Here's a video by “driving 4 answers” who seems to me to be well versed on the details of Internal Combustion engines. The video does cover something that's a bit shrouded in 'conspiracy theory', and he touches on that, but of course for phys.org, I'm only interested in the actual science involved. He analyzes the claim of achieving 100 mpg with a 427 cubic inch V8 1970 Ford Galaxy in 1977. Only the fuel supply system was modified. I was surprised that he feels the claim could have been...
TL;DR Summary: Heard in the news about using sonar to locate the sub Hello : After the sinking of the ship near the Greek shores , carrying of alot of people , there was another accident that include 5 tourists and a submarine visiting the titanic , which went missing Some technical notes captured my attention, that there us few sonar devices are hearing sounds repeated every 30 seconds , but they are not able to locate the source Is it possible that the sound waves are reflecting from...
Back
Top