Surety Obligations for Performance and Payment Bonds in Contractor Default

  • Thread starter Thread starter bobbarkernar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bonds performance
AI Thread Summary
In the case of a contractor defaulting with a performance bond and payment bond each valued at $100,000, the surety may be liable for the unpaid bills totaling $120,000. The owner paid the original contractor $540,000 for 60 percent of the $1,000,000 contract but incurred an additional $475,000 to complete the project with a new contractor. The surety's obligation includes covering the unpaid bills and potentially the difference in costs between the original and new contractor, which raises the total liability to approximately $215,000. The discussion emphasizes the need for clarity on surety obligations in construction contracts. Consulting a legal expert is recommended for specific claims and obligations.
bobbarkernar
Messages
48
Reaction score
0
A contractor furnished a performance bond having a face value of $100,000 and a payment bond of $100,000. The contract price was a lump sum of $1,000,000. The contractor had completed 60 percent of the work and had been paid $540,000 by the owner. Then the contractor defaulted, leaving unpaid bills to workmen and suppliers of $120,000. The owner engaged another contractor to finish the job for $475,000. Does the surety for the performance and payment bonds have to pay anything to the owner? If so, how much, and why?



What I thought was that the Surety would need to pay the full $100,000 of the performance and the full $100,000 of the payment bonds. However I am not sure if the surety would also be required to pay the difference between the new contractor finishing cost of $475,000 and the $460,000 finishing cost of the first contractor.
All together what I am thinking is that the surety would have to pay $215,000 to the owner.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Why the hell are you asking this in a physics forum? Go contact a local claims lawyer for matters like this, don't post them in the Engineering Systems and Design section.
 
This is an engineering question. Mainly pertaining to a design and build engineering project. (Fictional construction project)
 
Last edited:
Please remove...
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top