Surface area of solid of revolution with undefined derivative

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the surface area of a solid formed by revolving the curve defined by the function y=3x^{2/3}-1 between x=0 and x=8 about the x-axis. Participants explore the implications of the function's derivative being undefined at x=0 and whether this affects the calculation of the surface area, including considerations of improper integrals and the need to break the integral at points where the function changes sign.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether the undefined derivative at x=0 prevents the calculation of surface area using the standard formula for surface area.
  • Another participant suggests that the surface area can still be computed by treating the integral as an improper integral and taking limits as x approaches 0 from above.
  • There is a discussion about whether the integral should be broken at the point where the function crosses the x-axis, with some suggesting that the function must be non-negative for the integral to be valid.
  • A later reply proposes an alternative approach of integrating over y instead of x to avoid the issue of the improper integral, while still noting the necessity of breaking the integral at certain points.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on how to handle the undefined derivative and the implications for calculating the surface area. There is no consensus on whether the integral should be broken or if the improper integral can be evaluated directly.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention that the function's derivative is undefined at x=0, which raises questions about the validity of the integral over the specified range. The discussion includes considerations of the function changing sign and the implications for the surface area calculation.

Swallow
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Hello there.
Suppose I have a function:
y=3x^{2/3}-1

I want to find the surface area of the solid formed when the part of the curve between x=0 and x=8 is revolved about the x-axis.The curve crosses the x-axis at a point (1/3)^{3/2}
The derivative of the function is:
y'=2x^{-1/3} which is undefined at x=0, so can i still find the surface area by using the limits 0 to 8 in the formula for surface area i.e.

S.A.= Integral of( 2*pi* f(x)*\sqrt{1+f'(x)^{2}}) (with limits 0 to 8).

moreover, if I can find the surface area do i have to break the integral at the point at which the function changes form negative to positive?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
This probably sounds like a stupid question but given you are talking about a differential which is a sphere's surface why is it undefined at x=0.

Surely it is just dimensionless?

Sorry probably a mindless question between 0 and 8 though isn't it just a lower limit not undefined?

Might help might not to think of how the integral of a circles area or or a spheres volume relates to the derivative of a surface.
 
No Calrik, the diffrential isn't a sphere's surface, the final result (Obtained after integrating) gives you the surface area of the solid formed when that particular curve is revolved about the x-axis, AND that surface area has a definite value (it certainly isn't undefined).
Edit:
Oh and no problem, the only stupid question is the one that you don't ask. :)
 
Last edited:
Swallow said:
No Calrik, the diffrential isn't a sphere's surface, the final result (Obtained after integrating) gives you the surface area of the solid formed when that particular curve is revolved about the x-axis, AND that surface area has a definite value (it certainly isn't undefined)

Ok sorry, brain fart didn't quite understand what you were driving at.

At least I bumped your thread.

Carry on. :biggrin:

I think by topographical definition if you break the surface the calculus is non linear. That said you can stretch it to from a proof I guess.

Ie if we don't break it it defines the limits of what we can do to find an answer that is non "imaginary" if you see what I mean.

I'm probably not helping here am I, I'll get me coat. :Biggrin:
 
Last edited:
*BUMP*
Anyone?
Its a pretty straightforward question.
 
Yes, it is not uncommon to be able to integrate a function across some point where the integrand does not exist- it's an "improper" integral- take the limit as x approaches that point from each side. Here, since the point, x= 0, is one end of the range of integration, you just take the limit as x approaches 0 from above.
 
Swallow said:
Hello there.
Suppose I have a function:
y=3x^{2/3}-1

I want to find the surface area of the solid formed when the part of the curve between x=0 and x=8 is revolved about the x-axis.
The curve crosses the x-axis at a point (1/3)^{3/2}
The derivative of the function is:
y'=2x^{-1/3} which is undefined at x=0, so can i still find the surface area by using the limits 0 to 8 in the formula for surface area i.e.

S.A.= Integral of( 2*pi* f(x)*\sqrt{1+f'(x)^{2}}) (with limits 0 to 8).

moreover, if I can find the surface area do i have to break the integral at the point at which the function changes form negative to positive?

The function in your integral for surface area must be non-negative. One way to handle this is to break up the integral. Also, as you pointed out, \displaystyle y'=2x^{-1/3} is undefined at x=0, making the integral from 0 to 8 an improper integral.

S.A.= \displaystyle \lim_{a\to 0^+}\int_a^8 \left( 2\pi |f(x)|\sqrt{1+f'(x)^{2}}\right)\,dx

=\lim_{a\to 0^+}\int_a^{(1/3)^{3/2}} \left( -2\pi f(x)\sqrt{1+f'(x)^{2}}\right)\,dx \ \ +\,\int_{(1/3)^{3/2}}^8 \left( 2\pi f(x)\sqrt{1+f'(x)^{2}}\right)\,dx

As an alternative, you could integrate over y rather than x. That would eliminate having an improper integral., although you would still have to break up the integral.

In general:

S.A.= \displaystyle \int_C 2\pi |y|\ ds

If \displaystyle x=g(y), then S.A.= \displaystyle \int_{y_1}^{y_2} 2\pi|y|\sqrt{1+g'(y)}\ dy

For x ≥ 0, and y=3x^{2/3}-1, we have x=\displaystyle x=g(y)=\left({{y+1}\over{3}}\right)^{3/2}

So S.A.= \displaystyle -\int_{-1}^{0} 2\pi y\sqrt{1+g'(y)}\ dy\ \ +\int_{0}^{11} 2\pi y\sqrt{1+g'(y)}\ dy

Find \displaystyle g'(y)={{d}\over{dy}}g(y), then do the integration.

Added in edit:
I think you'll find that this integration is easier than the one over x.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K