Surface area to volume ratio problem

AI Thread Summary
To find the surface area of a sphere with a volume of 0.2 m³ without calculating the radius, one can manipulate the formulas for volume and surface area. The surface area to volume ratio simplifies to 3/r, which indicates a relationship between the two. The problem can be approached by solving one equation for the radius and substituting it into the other, rather than directly calculating the radius. The discussion emphasizes that the task is to determine the surface area based on the given volume, not to find the ratio. Ultimately, the solution requires a more complex manipulation of the equations rather than straightforward calculations.
uchicago2012
Messages
74
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find the surface area of a sphere whose volume is .2 m^3. For full credit, do it without finding the radius.


Homework Equations


This can be solved using
v= 4/3(pi)r^3 and sa= 4(pi)r^2, but my prof doesn't want that.


The Attempt at a Solution


so if you manipulate the volume and surface area formulas you can get that the sa:v ratio is 3/r, by cancelling the variables and such. I don't know where to go from there, though, even after reading about the surface area to volume ratio. I did solve the problem using regular math (I got 1.7 m^2) but I haven't been able to do anything else useful without solving for r.

Thanks in advance for any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You'll need to do something a little more complicated than just finding the ratio. You have two equations which share a common variable, r; try solving one of the equations for r and substituting it into the other one.
 
Your problem does not require finding "surface to volume ratio". It simply asks you what the surface area of a sphere with a known volume is.

Hint:

What is the ratio:

<br /> \frac{SA^{3}}{V^2} = ?<br />

equal to? Is it dependent on the radius? Can you solve this equation with respect to V?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top