Surface Charge Concept: Why Charges Move to Outer Surface

AI Thread Summary
Charges of the same sign repel each other and will always move to the outer surface of a conductor, even if the inner surface has a larger area. This behavior is primarily due to the need to maintain a zero electric field within the conductor, which occurs when charges are distributed on the outer surface. The discussion highlights that if charges were on the inner surface, they would be closer together, contradicting their natural tendency to repel. Understanding the relationship between electric potential, electric fields, and charge distribution clarifies why charges prefer the outer surface. Ultimately, the movement of charges ensures a static condition within the conductor, preventing any net electric field.
SirBerr
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
First post,

I know that charges of the same sign repel one another and that will attempt to move as far away from one another as possible. Now, I'm reading my physics textbook and it says charges will always move to the outer surface of a conductor even if the inner surface has a larger area. Think of a hollow sphere that has a pitted inner surface to give it more surface area than the outer.

Now why is this? My best guess is that because the electric field in a conductor is zero? What obvious thing am I missing here?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well if the charges were on the inside surface of a conductor, then they would be closer together wouldn't they?

It becomes clear if you consider how the inner surface area could possibly be bigger than the outer surface area.
 
The logic however is not very convincing. Think in terms of potential and Electric field (and obviously using r1<r2)
 
That makes slightly more sense now. I didn't consider the fields acorss the inner surface rather just the immediate surface around the charges. Not the clearest thing in the world but it makes a little bit more sense.
 
In addition, charges within a conductor will also move so as to create a zero field, a static condition, within the conductor...you can tell this happens because if their were a net field then the charges would move in reaction to it.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.
Back
Top