Surface integral in spherical coordinates question

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the surface area of a sphere defined by x^2 + y^2 + z^2 = 3c^2 that lies within the paraboloid 2cz = x^2 + y^2 using spherical coordinates. The intersection points of the sphere and paraboloid are established, leading to the conclusion that for positive c, they intersect at z = c, forming a circle of radius √2c in the x-y plane. The integration bounds for θ are confirmed to be from 0 to 2π, while the bounds for φ are determined to range from 0 to tan^(-1)(√2). The discussion reveals challenges with the integration process, particularly in ensuring the Cartesian and spherical coordinate results align, highlighting the complexities of vector calculus in this context. The conversation emphasizes the importance of maintaining Cartesian coordinates until necessary for integration to simplify the problem-solving process.
compliant
Messages
43
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find the surface area of the portion of the sphere x^2 + y^2 + z^2 = 3c^2 within the paraboloid 2cz = x^2 + y^2 using spherical coordinates. (c is a constant)

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


I converted all the x's to \rho sin\phi cos\theta, y's to \rho sin\phi sin\theta, z's to \rho cos\theta. Thus, the vector form of the sphere is \vec{r}(\varphi,\theta) = {\rho sin\phi cos\theta}\hat{i} + {\rho sin\phi sin\theta}\hat{j} + {\rho cos\theta}\hat{k}. Thus, {\left\|{{\vec{r}}_{\varphi}}\times {{\vec{r}}_{\theta}}\right\|} = {\sqrt{3c^2}} sin \varphi

Now I want to find the bounds of integration for the surface integral. I know theta goes from 0 to 2\pi, but for \varphi, I get this mess while trying to equate the paraboloid to the sphere:

2c({\rho cos\theta}) = {{\rho}^2 sin^2 \varphi}

When \theta = 0, \varphi = sin^{-1}({\sqrt{2c/{\rho}}}), and when \theta = 2\pi, \varphi = sin^{-1}({\sqrt{2c/{\rho}}}).

?

I really hate vector calculus.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would first identify the region using whatever coordinates I wanted to. Then you can carry out the integration using spherical coordinates. Equating them in Cartesian coordinates provides some very useful information.

How do you go about this? Well, you know that wherever the paraboloid and the sphere intersect, the circular cross sections in the x-y parallel plane will be of the same size. Ergo, where they meet, the quantity x^2 + y^2 will be the same. Rearranging and equating, we arrive at

3c^2 - z^2 = 2cz

Rearranging,

z^2 + 2cz - 3c^2 = 0

I think z comes out to be: [-2c +- sqrt(4c^2 + 12c^2)]/2 = -3c OR +c.

So you're right that theta goes from 0 to 2PI; the only question now is what the phi angle should do. You know it has to go from the top of the sphere down until the point where z = c (assuming c positive, this is the only sensible solution). So when is z = c? well, you have a circle of radius c*sqrt(3), and you need to be c up on it... so you know that c*sqrt(3) * cos(phi) = c.

I might have made some basic mistakes somewhere, but the idea is sound. Does that make sense? I wouldn't change things to spherical coordinates until you literally begin doing the integration. It's just so much easier to work with Cartesian as long as possible.
 
Well, the other part of the question (which I had done already) was doing it in Cartesians, so I know the two surfaces intersect at z = c, as you stated.

So,
(c \sqrt{3}) cos(\varphi) = c
cos (\varphi) = 1/{\sqrt{3}}
\varphi = a really ugly number.

Should I just keep this as cos^{-1} (1/{\sqrt{3}}) ? I guess it wouldn't be a bad idea. So then my integration is

\int_{0}^{2\pi} \int_{0}^{cos^{-1} (1/{\sqrt{3}})} {3c^2 sin(\varphi)} d\varphi d\theta
= {-6\pi c^2 cos(\varphi)]^{cos^{-1} (1/{\sqrt{3}})}_{0}}
= -6\pi c^2({1/{\sqrt{3}}}-1)
= 6\pi c^2(1-{1/{\sqrt{3}}})
 
Last edited:
But now I have a new problem with the surface area done in Cartesians. When z=c,

2c^2 = x^2 + y^2

where
-\sqrt{2c^2 - x^2} \leq y \leq \sqrt{2c^2 - x^2}

and
-\sqrt{2c^2} \leq x \leq \sqrt{2c^2}

dS for the sphere is {\sqrt{\frac{3c^2}{3c^2 - x^2 - y^2}}}dy dx

Surface area = \int_{-\sqrt{2c^2}}^{\sqrt{2c^2}} \int_{-\sqrt{2c^2 - x^2}}^{\sqrt{2c^2 - x^2}} {{\sqrt{\frac{3c^2}{3c^2 - x^2 - y^2}}}dy dx}
= c\sqrt{3} \int_{-\sqrt{2c^2}}^{\sqrt{2c^2}} \int_{-\sqrt{2c^2 - x^2}}^{\sqrt{2c^2 - x^2}} ({{\sqrt{3c^2 - x^2 - y^2}})^{-{\frac{1}{2}}}}dy dx}
= -c\sqrt{3} \int_{-\sqrt{2c^2}}^{\sqrt{2c^2}} ({\sqrt{3c^2 - x^2 - y^2}})^{{\frac{1}{2}}}} ]^{\sqrt{2c^2 - x^2}}_{-\sqrt{2c^2 - x^2}} dx}
= -c\sqrt{3} \int_{-\sqrt{2c^2}}^{\sqrt{2c^2}} (c-c) dx

But then...the integrand becomes zero. I don't think that's supposed to happen. =/
 
Last edited:
compliant said:

Homework Statement


Find the surface area of the portion of the sphere x^2 + y^2 + z^2 = 3c^2 within the paraboloid 2cz = x^2 + y^2 using spherical coordinates. (c is a constant)
The sphere and paraboloid intersect when 2cz+ z^2= 3c^2. Completing the square, z^2+ 2cz+ c^2= 4c^2 or z+ c= \pm 2c, z= c or z= -3c.

If c is positive, since 2cz= x^2+ y^2, z is positive: we must have z= c so x^2+ y^2= 2c^2, a circle or radius \sqrt{2}c.

If c is negative, z is negative: we must have z= -3c so x^2+y^2+ 9c^2= 3c^2 or x^2+ y^2= -6c^2. That's impossible so c must be positive and the two surfaces intersect on the circle x^2+ y^2= 2c^2, z= c.

Obviously \theta ranges from 0 to 2\pi. To find the limits on \phi, not that a point on the boundary circle is distance \sqrt{2}c from the z-axis and at height z= c. \phi is given by tan(\phi)= \sqrt{2}c/c= \sqrt{2}. \phi ranges from 0 to tan^{-1}(\sqrt{2}).

Because you are asked specifically to find the surface area, you should use spherical coordinates, with \rho= \sqrt{2}c to get parametric equations for the surface:
\vec{r}(\theta,\phi)= \sqrt{2}c cos(\theta)sin(\phi)\vec{i}+ \sqrt{2}c sin(\theta)sin(\phi)\vec{j}+ \sqrt{2}c cos(\phi)\vec{j}

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I converted all the x's to \rho sin\phi cos\theta, y's to \rho sin\phi sin\theta, z's to \rho cos\theta. Thus, the vector form of the sphere is \vec{r}(\varphi,\theta) = {\rho sin\phi cos\theta}\hat{i} + {\rho sin\phi sin\theta}\hat{j} + {\rho cos\theta}\hat{k}. Thus, {\left\|{{\vec{r}}_{\varphi}}\times {{\vec{r}}_{\theta}}\right\|} = {\sqrt{3c^2}} sin \varphi

Now I want to find the bounds of integration for the surface integral. I know theta goes from 0 to 2\pi, but for \varphi, I get this mess while trying to equate the paraboloid to the sphere:

2c({\rho cos\theta}) = {{\rho}^2 sin^2 \varphi}

When \theta = 0, \varphi = sin^{-1}({\sqrt{2c/{\rho}}}), and when \theta = 2\pi, \varphi = sin^{-1}({\sqrt{2c/{\rho}}}).

?




I really hate vector calculus.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yes, but unforunately, my Cartesian answer not the same.

I see now why though:

c\sqrt{3} \int_{-\sqrt{2c^2}}^{\sqrt{2c^2}} \int_{-\sqrt{2c^2 - x^2}}^{\sqrt{2c^2 - x^2}} ({{\sqrt{3c^2 - x^2 - y^2}})^{-{\frac{1}{2}}}}dy dx}
= -c\sqrt{3} \int_{-\sqrt{2c^2}}^{\sqrt{2c^2}} ({\sqrt{3c^2 - x^2 - y^2}})^{{\frac{1}{2}}}} ]^{\sqrt{2c^2 - x^2}}_{-\sqrt{2c^2 - x^2}} dx}

Obviously this isn't what one should get after integrating that term. And I can't exactly stick in a 1/y right in front of the bracket to cancel out the y term that comes out after doing the Chain Rule. Does anyone know how to integrate it? =/
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
3K