Surface integral in Spherical Polar

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 2K views
samjohnny
Messages
83
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Attached.

Homework Equations



cd7a7dabc3ed67196d363a39be943c45.png

01218db9301c3665178919b26218da4b.png

d9beecbcecba1ca83ecd273a33330938.png

1f5ce7228bc649add6fcd17c1ddbf174.png


The Attempt at a Solution


Hi,

Ok, so for the first part of this question it asks to evaluate the integral of the dot product between A and dS. The magnitude of dS is as shown above, and it is in the radial direction in spherical polar coordinates. Here, A(r) is the unit vector of θ in spherical polar. And since we know that the polar direction θ and the radial direction are orthogonal to each, their dot product must = 0. Therefore, the integral of A.dS must be equal to zero. Is this line of thought correct?

Thanks.
 

Attachments

  • Spherical.JPG
    Spherical.JPG
    30.8 KB · Views: 435
Physics news on Phys.org
samjohnny said:

Homework Statement


Attached.

Homework Equations



cd7a7dabc3ed67196d363a39be943c45.png

01218db9301c3665178919b26218da4b.png

d9beecbcecba1ca83ecd273a33330938.png

1f5ce7228bc649add6fcd17c1ddbf174.png


The Attempt at a Solution


Hi,

Ok, so for the first part of this question it asks to evaluate the integral of the dot product between A and dS. The magnitude of dS is as shown above, and it is in the radial direction in spherical polar coordinates. Here, A(r) is the unit vector of θ in spherical polar. And since we know that the polar direction θ and the radial direction are orthogonal to each, their dot product must = 0. Therefore, the integral of A.dS must be equal to zero. Is this line of thought correct?

Thanks.
No, the direction of [itex]d\underline{S}[/itex] is not "in the radial direction". The "vector differential of area" is [itex](a^2cos(\theta)sin^2(\phi)\vec{i}+ a^2sin(\theta)sin^2(\phi)\vec{j}+ a^2 sin(\phi)cos(\phi)\vec{k})d\theta d\phi[/itex]. That is not a multiple of a radial vector which would be of the form [itex]r cos(\theta)sin(\phi)\vec{i}+ r sin(\theta)sin(\phi)\vec{j}+ r cos(\phi)\vec{k}[/itex].
 
HallsofIvy said:
No, the direction of [itex]d\underline{S}[/itex] is not "in the radial direction". The "vector differential of area" is [itex](a^2cos(\theta)sin^2(\phi)\vec{i}+ a^2sin(\theta)sin^2(\phi)\vec{j}+ a^2 sin(\phi)cos(\phi)\vec{k})d\theta d\phi[/itex]. That is not a multiple of a radial vector which would be of the form [itex]r cos(\theta)sin(\phi)\vec{i}+ r sin(\theta)sin(\phi)\vec{j}+ r cos(\phi)\vec{k}[/itex].

Thanks for the reply. But if I'm thinking about this right, couldn't you factor out of that vector the scalar a^2*sin(α) which would leave the unit vector in the radial direction? Please see the attached.
 

Attachments

  • Notes.JPG
    Notes.JPG
    16.6 KB · Views: 429