BIT1749
- 13
- 0
gauss's theorem is also applicable to charge in motion.but how the surface integral has to be taken??
The discussion revolves around the application of Gauss's theorem to charge in motion, specifically focusing on how to properly evaluate the surface integral involved. Participants explore the implications of time dependence and the nature of the charge considered in the integral.
Participants express differing views on whether the surface integral should be evaluated over time or at a single instant, indicating a lack of consensus on this aspect of Gauss's theorem in the context of charge in motion.
There are unresolved questions regarding the assumptions made about the charge and the treatment of relativistic effects, as well as the implications of a moving Gaussian surface on the integral.
No, the integral is a 2D integral over a spatial surface defined at a single instant of time.BIT1749 said:i have read in a book that the surface integral has to be taken over a period of time
huh? You put the charge in place of the charge. You can't put anything else there.BIT1749 said:.but what value should we put in place of charge??
I don't think that is a necessary assumption. Maxwell's equations are fully relativistic already.dauto said:(assuming no charges with relativistic speed are present)
In that specific example, they may have been considering a time-average... But in general as others have said, Gauss' theorem works at every instant of time. So you can integrate over time and then divide by the time interval if you want to get a time average.BIT1749 said:i have read in a book that the surface integral has to be taken over a period of time.but what value should we put in place of charge??