Surface of Equal Gravitational Potential

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the equation of the surface where gravitational potential is equal between the Earth and the Sun. The user begins by exploring the relationship between the distances from a point (x,y) to both celestial bodies, using their masses and gravitational potential equations. They set the Sun's position at (0,0) and the Earth's at (0,k) to simplify calculations. The user seeks validation for their approach, which involves equating the gravitational potentials and deriving a relationship between the distances. Overall, the method appears sound, and the user receives positive feedback on their progress.
amcavoy
Messages
663
Reaction score
0
In my introductory physics class, we were given a problem to find the equation of the surface between the Earth and the Sun where the gravitational potential is equal. At first (without working anything out), it seems that it might be some sort of ellipsoid or paraboloid. For now, I'm just going to look at a level curve and try to work it out in two dimensions.

Let M be the mass of the sun, and m be the mass of the earth. Let r1 be the distance from the Earth to a point (x,y) on the graph and r2 be the distance from the sun to the same point (x,y):

-\frac{GM}{r_2}=-\frac{Gm}{r_1}\implies r_1M=r_2m

Now I am going to set the center of the sun as point (0,0) and the Earth as (0,k). Doing so gives:

M\sqrt{x^2+\left(y-k\right)^2}=m\sqrt{x^2+y^2}

I also know that when x=0, r1+r2 is the distance from the Earth to the sun.

I am not finished yet. I would just like to know if my approach is valid. Could someone let me know?

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks good to me.
 
Great, thank you for the help.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top