Surface of recolution of a curve integrating wrong :-(

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves finding the area of the surface of revolution generated by revolving the curve y = sqrt(x² + 1) from x = 0 to x = sqrt(2) about the x-axis. Participants are discussing the integration process and the application of the surface area formula.

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to integrate the expression derived from the surface area formula but questions the correctness of their integration process. Some participants suggest checking the integration by differentiation and consider switching to polar coordinates, while others mention hyperbolic coordinates.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different approaches to verify the integration. There is no explicit consensus on the correctness of the integration, and multiple interpretations of the problem are being considered.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that they have not yet covered polar coordinates in their studies, which may limit their ability to apply that method effectively. There is also mention of a conflicting solution from another source that does not seem to yield the correct result.

darkwolfe5
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



the curve y= sqrt(x² +1) , 0 ≤ x ≤ sqrt(2) is revolved about the x-axis to generate a surface. Find the area of the surface of revolution.

Homework Equations



A = 2π ∫ f (x) * sqrt[1+f ' (x)] dx

The Attempt at a Solution



I've gotten down to 2π ∫ sqrt(2x²+1) dx
and I know that's correct thus far (confirmed using my calculator)
calc says: 13.14153998

but once I integrate, I get 2π[ ⅔ * (2x²+1)^(3/2) with the limits from 0 to sqrt(2)
Once I substitute the sqrt(2) I get something way out of the park.
calc says: 46.832...

Did I do my integration right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can check if it's right by differentiating. After you have checked and seen that it's not, the easiest way forward is to switch variables to polar coordinates.
 
clamtrox said:
You can check if it's right by differentiating. After you have checked and seen that it's not, the easiest way forward is to switch variables to polar coordinates.

We haven't gotten to polar coordinates yet...that's what we're supposed to start on Monday :-(
 
Oops, I mean hyperbolic coordinates (that probably doesn't help, but still :)
 
well I've had someone on another site tell me:

<quote>
∫ √( 2x² + 1 ) dx

= √2* ∫ √( x² + 0.5 ) dx

= √2* { (x/2)*√( x² + .5) + (0.5/2)*ln [ x + √( x² + 0.5) ] } between x = 0 and x = √2.
</quote>

But that doesn't seem to calculate right to me either.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
11K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K