Surface Tension: Bubble Volume & Container Wall Contact

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around whether an air bubble's volume changes when it contacts a container wall, assuming a contact angle of 90 degrees and neglecting hydrostatic pressure. It is noted that without hydrostatic pressure, the bubble's expansion is influenced solely by surface tension forces. The radius of curvature of the bubble is questioned, with considerations about the container's shape potentially affecting this curvature. The consensus suggests that surface tension alone cannot dictate volume changes without the influence of pressure. The question is criticized for its lack of clarity and precision.
Otaku123445
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



An air bubble rises in water and makes contact with a container wall. Does contact with the solid surface change the bubble volume even if the surface is neither hydrophilic nor hydrophobic, but forms a contact angle of 90 degrees with the air-water interface?(Neglect Hydrostatic pressure)

Homework Equations


Young's Equation
γsl - γs + γlv.cos θ = 0


The Attempt at a Solution


I know for sure that if hydrostatic pressure is taken into account, then as the bubble rises it expands. But, in the absence of pressure as it hits the container there is only tension forces. But, I'm not sure if the radius of curvature of bubble will be larger or smaller .
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you consider the shape of a container which minimises the ratio of surface to volume that should help you with the radius of curvature.

I don't think surface tension can be included without hydrostatic pressure (the bubble would sink) so the question really seems to be "If you change the shape of a closed container of air, without changing the pressure, does the volume change?"

I feel the real problem here isn't with you but whoever set this sloppy question.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top