Surface Tension: Estimating Droplet Radius with a Sprayer

AI Thread Summary
To estimate the radius of each droplet produced by a sprayer, equate the volume of the liquid exiting the sprayer to the total volume of the smaller droplets formed. Given a liquid density 'p' and a sprayer hole radius 'r', the volume of the large drop can be calculated. This volume is then divided by 'n', the number of equal-sized droplets, to find the volume of each droplet. Using the volume formula for a sphere, the radius of each droplet can be derived. This method effectively allows for the estimation of droplet size based on the initial conditions of the sprayer.
Nuclear on the Rocks
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
i have a question on surface tension.
if i had a a sprayer which squirted a liquid of density p through a hole of radius 'r', following which the liquid breaks into 'n' equal-sized droplets.can i estimate the radius of each droplet??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes equate the volume of large drop to the volume of n small drops.
 
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
Back
Top