Surface Volume and Line charge densities, how to solve problems?

AI Thread Summary
To solve the problem of finding the electric field strength at various distances from a uniformly charged solid sphere, the Shell Theorem can be applied. This theorem states that a spherically symmetric charge distribution behaves as if all its charge were concentrated at its center. For distances less than the sphere's radius, the electric field is zero, while for distances greater than the radius, the electric field can be calculated using E = q/(4πε₀r²). The discussion clarifies that while Gaussian surfaces can be used, the Shell Theorem simplifies the process. Understanding charge densities is important for determining the enclosed charge, but in this case, the focus is on applying the theorem effectively.
turtieari
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
This question is a perfect example:

A solid sphere 25cm in radius carries 14microC, distributed uniformly throughout it's volume. Find the electric field strength a) 15cm b)25cm and c)50 cm from center.

I know that I need my gaussian surface and I also need
p=q/v where p is the (Qenclosed) in the equation: Qenclosed/epsilon=EA

Could someone help me understand what the charge densities are for. Do I have to subsitute Qenclosed for p or do I just use it as a clue that I need the volume?

Thank you for your time!

Warmest regards,
ARi :"D
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't think you actually need to use Gauss's law for this one, TBH. Since it's a sphere with uniform ρ, by the Shell Theorem, it acts like all the charge were centered at, well, the center. I'd solve using

E = q/(4πε₀r^2)

If you really want to use a Gaussian surface, since it's symmetrical:

qenc/ε₀ = EA -> E = 14µC/ε₀(4πR^2)

Where R is .15m+whatever the distance is from the sphere. Since the shell theorem comes from Gauss's Law, sort of, I guess they're actually the same answer, though.

Hope this helps.
 
The shell theorem is new to me. Maybe I don't know with that name. THANK YOU!
 
The shell theorem says if you have a "shell", infinitely thin and spherical with uniform charge density, the charge acts as if all the charge were at the center. It also works with rings, but not in the 3rd dimeension. The corollary is that a solid sphere, being an infinite number of shells, also acts as if it were at the center.

We learned it in AP physics, but I don't know if it's a 'real' theorem.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top