Surprising Gamma Rays From Crab Nebula

AI Thread Summary
Astronomers have detected gamma rays from the Crab Pulsar at energies exceeding 100 gigaelectronvolts, challenging existing pulsar models. This discovery, made using the VERITAS telescope array, suggests that current theories cannot fully explain the formation of these high-energy emissions. The findings indicate that gamma rays are produced more than 10 stellar radii from the neutron star, necessitating further observations with advanced equipment. Researchers emphasize the significance of this experimental approach, which defied conventional expectations. Overall, the results highlight gaps in our understanding of pulsar magnetospheres and the mechanisms behind such energetic emissions.
Dotini
Gold Member
Messages
634
Reaction score
231
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-15203788
Astronomers have spotted gamma ray emissions coming from the Crab Pulsar at far higher energies than expected.

This challenges notions of how these powerful electromagnetic rays - like light, but far more energetic - are formed, researchers suggest in Science.

They found emissions at more than 100 gigaelectronvolts - 100 billion times more energetic than visible light.


http://www.sciencemag.org/content/334/6052/69
Abstract

We report the detection of pulsed gamma rays from the Crab pulsar at energies above 100 giga–electron volts (GeV) with the Very Energetic Radiation Imaging Telescope Array System (VERITAS) array of atmospheric Cherenkov telescopes. The detection cannot be explained on the basis of current pulsar models. The photon spectrum of pulsed emission between 100 mega–electron volts and 400 GeV is described by a broken power law that is statistically preferred over a power law with an exponential cutoff. It is unlikely that the observation can be explained by invoking curvature radiation as the origin of the observed gamma rays above 100 GeV. Our findings require that these gamma rays be produced more than 10 stellar radii from the neutron star.

Respectfully submitted,
Steve
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
The findings reveal that current models of pulsars are, at a minimum, incomplete. Speaking to this fact, The Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory's Martin Schroedte, who performed most of the analytical work for the study, said :

If you asked theorists a year ago whether we would see gamma-ray pulses this energetic, almost all of them would have said, "No." There's just no theory that can account for what we've found.
The researchers explore several scenarios that could explain the unprecedented observations in a paper published in today's issue of Science, but ultimately conclude that more observations — possibly requiring next-generation observatory equipment — will be necessary before any new pulsar models can be drawn up.

For now, astronomers are left to ruminate on the game-changing results of an experiment that many thought should never have been performed.

"To me it's a real triumph of the experimental approach, not going along with the flow and making assumptions, but just observing to see what there is," said astronomer Rene Ong, spokesperson for the VERITAS gamma ray observatory that was used to detect the Crab Pulsar's radiation.

"And lo and behold, we see something different than what everybody expected."


http://io9.com/nepomuk-otte/

Respectfully submitted,
Steve
 
Wow that's a huge amount of energy...
 
250px-Crab_Nebula.jpg

Wikipedia said:
the Crab is generally the strongest persistent source in the sky, with measured flux extending to above 10^12 eV.

It may be possible that Type II supernova explosions above 9 solar masses produce baryogenic anti-proton and anti-neutron antimatter residue, as a result of the stellar core shock wave rebounding at near luminous velocity. This could also explain the missing matter and the measured flux, if a matter-antimatter contributing event occurred during the stellar core shock wave rebound.
[/Color]
Reference:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crab_Nebula"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think that we have an example of *OH MY FREAKING WORD-ism* by popular press. The press loves to make things dramatic and breathlessly interesting.

Dotini said:
The findings reveal that current models of pulsars are, at a minimum, incomplete.


Which is something that we already new. There is a lot we don't understand about the magnetic fields of pulsars.

If you asked theorists a year ago whether we would see gamma-ray pulses this energetic, almost all of them would have said, "No."

I don't think that's true. Since pulsar magnetospheres are not very well understood, it's very hard to say categorically that something can't happen. Having extremely high energy gamma rays is interesting, but it's not totally unexpected.

Here is the original paper

http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1108/1108.3797.pdf

This is before you to through the *OH MY FREAKING WORD* filter.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...

Similar threads

Back
Top