Survey:What is your perception of canonically quantizing a free field?

  • Thread starter Thread starter dextercioby
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Field Perception
dextercioby
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
13,388
Reaction score
4,040
Survey:What is your perception of canonically quantizing a free field??

The idea came to me when i searched through different QFT books in order to get a unitary picture of this issue,which historically emerged in 1926,i.e.of describing particles through quantum fields.I'm refering,in beginnning,to free particles/fields.
I want to know your opinions (i.e. what canonic quantizing means to you),in order to compare to mine and then draw the appropriate conclusions to the benefit of all reading this forum.
I'm not trying to look smart,i'm only curious about how QFT is taught in universities worldwide,as,probably in a few yers,I myself would have to explain to students what first/second/third/...quantizing means and apply it to specific problems in the SM of Particles and Interactions.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think of it as a mathematical trick that helps us construct irreducible representations of the Poincaré group.

By the way, there's another thread that discusses this subject intensively. Maybe you should check it out. I think it was called "Why quantizing fields?".
 
Last edited:


My perception of canonically quantizing a free field is that it is a mathematical tool used in quantum field theory to describe the behavior of particles. It involves assigning operators to each field, which represent the physical observables of the system. This allows us to calculate probabilities and make predictions about the behavior of particles in a given field. To me, canonically quantizing a free field means using a specific mathematical framework to describe the quantum nature of particles and their interactions.

I think it is important to understand the historical context of this concept and how it has evolved over time. It is also crucial to have a strong understanding of the underlying mathematical principles and how they are applied in specific problems within the Standard Model of particle physics.

I believe that teaching canonically quantizing a free field should involve a balance of theoretical concepts and practical applications. It is important to have a solid understanding of the mathematical framework, but it is equally important to be able to apply it to real-world problems. I think it is also important to continuously discuss and explore new developments and advancements in the field, as it is a constantly evolving area of study.

Overall, my perception is that canonically quantizing a free field is a fundamental tool in understanding the quantum nature of particles and their interactions. It requires a strong understanding of mathematical concepts and their applications, as well as a continuous exploration of new developments in the field.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top