Surviving the Pressure: Trapped Inside a Sinking Ship

  • Thread starter Thread starter Gondur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pressure Ship
AI Thread Summary
Survival in a watertight chamber inside a sinking ship depends on the strength of the chamber's walls against increasing ocean pressure. Calculating pressure at various depths reveals the immense forces involved, indicating that typical chambers would likely implode before reaching the ocean floor. Even submarines, designed for deep-sea exploration, can experience implosion if they exceed their depth limits. Only specially engineered vessels, such as the Aluminaut, are capable of withstanding extreme underwater pressures. Ultimately, the structural integrity of the chamber is crucial for survival in such dire conditions.
Gondur
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
If you were trapped inside water tight chamber inside a sinking ship, would you survive all the way to the bottom of the Pacific Ocean? Or would the pressure crush the walls of the chamber at some depth?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It depends on how strong the walls of the chamber are. It would be a good exercise for you to calculate the pressure at various depths, get a feeling for the magnitude of the forces involved.
 
Yes the walls would implode on you. Even submarines implode if they go too deep. Only specially designed vessels like https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aluminaut can go deeper.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top