Suspended hotel walkway (Young's modulus problem)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Halfpixel
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Modulus
AI Thread Summary
A problem involving a suspended hotel walkway requires calculating the downward movement when a load of 8500N is applied. The steel cable and aluminum column have specific Young's modulus values, and their respective cross-sectional areas were calculated. The key to solving the problem lies in recognizing that the total force exerted on the system must equal the applied load, allowing for the rearrangement of equations to find the individual forces on the cable and column. Once the forces are determined, the equations can be solved to find the total downward movement of the walkway. This approach clarifies the relationship between the forces and the resulting displacements in the materials.
Halfpixel
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
Here's a (hopefully) quick question for you guys... I'm completely stumped on this problem; any help would be appreciated.

Homework Statement



A walkway suspended across a hotel lobby is supported at numerous points along its edges by a vertical cable above and a vertical column underneath. The steel cable is 1.27cm in diameter and is 5.75m long before loading. The aluminum column is a hollow cylinder with an outside diameter of 16.24cm and an inside diameter of 16.14cm, and an unloaded length of 3.25m. When the walkway exerts a load force of 8500N on one of the support points, how much does the point move down?

Homework Equations



Young's modulus: Y = \frac{F\ast L}{A\ast\Delta L}

Y value for steel: 20 \times 10^{10} N/m^2
Y value for aluminum: 7.0 \times 10^{10} N/m^2

The Attempt at a Solution



I started by getting the applicable cross-sectional area of the column and the wire. Since the column is hollow, its area should be:

A = Outer area - inner area

which I worked out to be 0.000254m^2.

The wire is solid, so its cross-sectional area is the same as that of any circle; I worked that out to be 0.000126m^2.

Taking the Y-values for steel and aluminum, I get the following two equations:

\frac{F_1*L_1}{A_1* \Delta L_1} = 7.0 \times 10^{10} N/m^2

\frac{F_2*L_2}{A_2* \Delta L_2} = 20 \times 10^{10} N/m^2

Though the force exerted on the wire is not the same as the force exerted on the column and their modulus values are different, the walkway must be in equilibrium so the amount that the wire stretches must be equal to the amount that the column shrinks.

So \Delta L_1 = \Delta L_2 = \Delta L.

Rearranging and combining my two equations, I then come up with...

\Delta L = \frac{F_1*L_1}{A_1* 7.0 \times 10^{10} N/m^2} = \frac{F_2*L_2}{A_2 * 20 \times 10^{10} N/m^2}

But since I don't know what portion of the force is exerted on the wire and which portion is exerted on the column (I know it's not 50/50), I don't know where to go from here. I know I'm missing something and I'm sure it's fairly obvious, but I'm completely stuck. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Halfpixel said:
\Delta L = \frac{F_1*L_1}{A_1* 7.0 \times 10^{10} N/m^2} = \frac{F_2*L_2}{A_2 * 20 \times 10^{10} N/m^2}

But since I don't know what portion of the force is exerted on the wire and which portion is exerted on the column (I know it's not 50/50), I don't know where to go from here. I know I'm missing something and I'm sure it's fairly obvious, but I'm completely stuck. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Your work is very good. Just carry through with your equation, plugging in the values for the respective L's, A's and Y's, and you will come up with F1 as a certain percentage of F2! (and note that F1 + F2 = the total applied load).
 
  • Like
Likes Rollo_x
Thanks! I actually had an epiphany about this right after I woke up this morning... I realized that, of course, F_1 + F_2 equals the total applied force (8500N), so rearranging the equations in terms of F and then adding them together allows one to solve the problem very easily.

Hopefully that'll help someone in the future...
 
  • Like
Likes Rollo_x
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top