Courses Swapping Courses: How to Decide When Changing Majors

  • Thread starter Thread starter l'Hôpital
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Courses
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a student's decision to switch from an Engineering major to a more suitable path that aligns with their passion for math. They have a solid foundation in Calculus but are concerned about the rigor of their current Calculus III course and their proof skills. The student is considering applying for an honors class that offers a more rigorous treatment of Multivariable Calculus, using a recommended text that builds from the ground up. They are weighing the risks of seeking permission for the honors class against the potential benefits of proving their mathematical talent. Ultimately, the advice leans towards pursuing the honors class if they are prepared to commit to the hard work required.
l'Hôpital
Messages
255
Reaction score
0
Hello all.

So, let me explain my situation. Originally, I signed up for an Engineering major, figuring it was what I should do, since I liked math. So, I signed up for my classes, and it was all good. However, a lot of things happened over the summer. Things that've changed my views on the matter. I've realized now that trying to appeal to my love for math through Engineering was not smart and that I should change now while I can. Luckily, most of the classes are similar, so I only had to drop two classes (I was doing a double major so I had the math classes in already).

Currently, I have credit for Calc 1 and 2. I feel I have a strong base in these two from math competitions and the likes. However, I also understand that REAL Calculus it's not something you really learn from a book like Stewart, so I've been reading up Spivak's "Calculus" in order to reinforce my Calculus knowledge.

Currently, I'm signed up for Calculus III offered by the school's Engineering department. It's very technology based (lot of Mathematica) using the book "Vector Calculus" by Tromba and Marsden. I know the text is slightly more rigorous than others, but I still feel the class won't be as rigorous as I need it to be. Now, at my school, there is an honors track, but within the honors, they also have a side-track for Multivariable, a very rigorous treatment. Now, currently, I got screwed over through my application and didn't make it into honors college. However, I found out that you can sign up for honors classes if you obtain permission. For this particular class, however, you also need permission from the department as it requires "mathematical talent". In a sense, this worries me since my proof skills are a bit weak, and my exposure to rigorous math only goes as far as I've gotten in Spivak and some studying for things like the AMC or Mu Alpha Theta. And I don't want to go jump over multiple loops to obtain such a hard permission only to get owned and get a C.

I checked the book used by the class. It is "Vector Calculus, Linear Algebra, and Differential Forms: A Unified Approach" by Hubbard. This text itself was recommended to me if I wanted to pick up a more rigorous treatment of Multivariable, so the fact that it is the text for the class makes it seem perfect. So, I suppose the question is, should I try to get the permission and take the class? Should I just stick with what I have? Or should I take what I have currently and maybe switch later?

The last option seems good since it'd give me time to prove I have the "mathematical talent" (if I have it), but I don't know if I'd miss too much by the time I got in already.

So, what should I do?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hubbard & Hubbard doesn't assume that you've seen rigorous math before -- they try to do everything from the ground up -- so I think you should try to get permission for the honors class ASAP, as long as you're willing to work *really* hard. Note: H & H is a great book, but if you use it, it's absolutely essential to continually check their online errata file, which at 36 (yes, thirty-six) pages is rather long for a 3rd edition, but corrects some really bad errors (such as their train wreck "proof" of the inverse function theorem), as well as trivial typo mistakes. Good luck!
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
40
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
32
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
2K
Back
Top