Swinging on a rope minimum horizontal speed

AI Thread Summary
To determine the minimum horizontal speed for the hiker swinging across the ravine, the conservation of mechanical energy principle should be applied. The hiker starts with kinetic energy (KE) that converts into potential energy (PE) as she swings upward to the far edge. The height gained during the swing can be calculated using the geometry of the swing, forming a right triangle with the rope length and horizontal distance. The initial KE must equal the PE at the highest point to find the required speed. This approach clarifies that the hiker's motion is not projectile-based but involves swinging dynamics.
fire765
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
A hiker plans to swing on a rope across a ravine in the mountains, as illustrated in the figure, where L = 4.9 m and x = 2.7 m, and to drop when she is just above the far edge. At what minimum horizontal speed should she be moving when she starts to swing(in m/s)?


5-32alt.gif



I tried using the equation for range (x=(vo^2sin2(angle))/g but it didnt work, and I am guessing I am on the complete wrong track.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why don't you do it the other way round? Suppose the hiker starts from the right at zero speed. Like a pendulum, she has to swing to the left side, and you can find the speed on the left side. Reversing the situation will give you that required speed.

If you don't like this approach, I will of course give you the solution.
 
You can also think about it this way, when the hiker is above the second edge, he has gained potential energy but lost kinetic energy. Equate the two and you get your minimum velocity.
 
fire765 said:
I tried using the equation for range (x=(vo^2sin2(angle))/g but it didnt work, and I am guessing I am on the complete wrong track.
That range equation is for finding the horizontal distance traveled by a projectile--where the only force acting on the object is gravity. In this problem, the hiker is not a projectile--she's hanging on to a rope!

Use conservation of mechanical energy.
 
Draw a proper diagram. The two positions of the rope make up an isosceles triangle. Drop a perpendicular from the right end-point (where she’s holding the rope), to the vertical rope on the left. The length of that perpendicular is x. Let the increase in vertical height from left position to the right position be h. Now you have a right angled triangle relating x, L and h.

The KE at the start on the left is becoming PE on the right, because she has gained a height of h. Now can you say what should have been the initial KE to rise through a height h?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top