Symmetric looking equations needing a symmetric solution

  • Thread starter Thread starter FrankDrebon
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Symmetric
FrankDrebon
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

I have a set of equations that look very nice and symmetric, but the only way I'm able to find solutions to them is with pages and pages of algebra! Can any members with more of a mathematical flair than myself point me in the direction of a more direct and satisfactory method of solution?

The equations are:

\frac{{A_1 }}{{A_1 + A_2 + A_3 }} = \frac{{b_1 c_1 }}{{b_1 c_1 + b_2 c_2 + b_3 c_3 }}

\frac{{A_2 }}{{A_1 + A_2 + A_3 }} = \frac{{b_2 c_2 }}{{b_1 c_1 + b_2 c_2 + b_3 c_3 }}

\frac{{A_3 }}{{A_1 + A_2 + A_3 }} = \frac{{b_3 c_3 }}{{b_1 c_1 + b_2 c_2 + b_3 c_3 }}

Given that:

b_1 + b_2 + b_3 = 1

I am looking to express b_1, b_2 and b_3 in terms of A_1, A_2, A_3, c_1, c_2 and c_3.

In general, I guess the problem would be:

A_i \sum\limits_j {b_j c_j } = b_i c_i \sum\limits_j {A_j }

\sum\limits_j {b_j } = 1

I have solved the problem for the j = 2 case, with the neat looking solutions:

b_1 = \frac{{A_1 c_2 }}{{A_1 c_2 + A_2 c_1 }}

b_2 = \frac{{A_2 c_1 }}{{A_1 c_2 + A_2 c_1 }}

I'm looking for similar solutions to j = 3, or more...if a general solution is obvious to someone else!

Any ideas?

Thanks in advance,

FD
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I'll write your equations as:

[Eqs. 1] \frac{A_i}{\sum_j Aj} = \frac {b_i c_i}{\sum_j b_j c_j}


Introduce another variable \theta defined by

[Eq. 2] \theta = \frac {\sum_j b_j c_j} {\sum_j A_j}

Multiplying the left sides of [Eqs. 1] by \frac{\theta}{\theta} gives:

[Eqs. 3] \frac{\theta A_i}{\sum_j b_j c_j} = \frac {b_i c_i}{\sum_j b_j c_j}

so

[Eqs 4] b_i = \theta \frac{A_i}{c_i}


Since \sum_j b_j = 1 we have:

[Eq 5] \sum_j \theta \frac{A_j}{c_j} = \theta \sum_j {A_j}{c_j} = 1

Sovling for \theta gives:

[Eq 6] \theta = \frac{1}{\sum_j \frac{A_j}{c_j}}

Substituting in [Eqs 4] gives

[Eqs 7] b_i = \frac{1}{\sum_j \frac{A_j}{c_j}} \frac{A_i}{c_i}

Of course, you must check none of the steps involve division by zero. Also my reasoning seems suspiciously circular!
 
Ahhhh, that works beautifully - nice one!
 
That was an elegant solution, I would like to add another one.
Dividing the sides of the ith equation by the sides of the jth equation gives:
\frac{A_i}{A_j}=\frac{b_ic_i}{b_jc_j}
And then:
b_j=\frac{A_j}{c_j}\frac{c_i}{A_i}b_i
Thus:
\sum_{j}b_j=\frac{c_i}{A_i}b_i\sum_{j}\frac{A_j}{c_j}
And since \sum_{j}b_j=1 we get:
b_i=\frac{A_i}{c_i}\frac{1}{\sum_{j}\frac{A_j}{c_j}}
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top