Symmetry Breaking

  • Thread starter alphaone
  • Start date
  • #1
46
0

Main Question or Discussion Point

Hi,
I have done classical symmetry breaking and now want to understand the quantum one. I have seen the statement that the symmetry is broken if and only if Q|0> not 0. Where |0> is the vacuum and Q is the associated charge of the broken symmetry. Why does this imply symmetry breaking? The way I know it a symmetry group G is broken to a subgroup H if the theory is invariant under G whereas the vacuum is invariant only under H, meaning h|0>=|0> for any h element H and g|0> not equal |0> for any g not in H. Is this the right definition? And if so does this imply Q|0> not 0 in the case of a broken symmetry?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
46
0
I think I figured it out myself:
Any symmetry transformation can be represented by either a unitary operator U or an antiunitary operator A acting on the space of states, i.e. U|phi> is the transformed state(for the case of a unitary operator) now if I am not mistaken we can write U = exp(i*x*Q) (x being a parameter here and not spacetime position) where Q is the associated charge of the symmetry. Then for the symmetry to be mainfest we require U|0>=|0> which is equivalent to saying Q|0>=0 when expanding the exponential. A question I have about this is: Does this also hold for symetries being represented by antihermitian operators, i.e. if the states transform under the symmetry as A|phi> can I still write A=exp(i*x*Q) where Q is the conserved charge? In this case the charge would then be antihermitian instead of hermitian, I guess.
 

Related Threads on Symmetry Breaking

  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
623
  • Last Post
Replies
8
Views
13K
Top