Syntax for a sequence in a set X

  • Thread starter Thread starter imurme8
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sequence Set
AI Thread Summary
Using the notation "a sequence {x_n} ∈ ℝ" is considered incorrect and an abuse of notation. The proper way to express this is "Given a sequence (x_n)_n with each x_n ∈ ℝ." This distinction is important to avoid confusion regarding the relationship between sequences and the set of real numbers. The discussion emphasizes the importance of adhering to established mathematical conventions for clarity. Proper syntax ensures effective communication in mathematical contexts.
imurme8
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
Syntax for a sequence "in" a set X

It is well-known shorthand to say that a sequence of real numbers x_n is a sequence "in R". (Of course we do not mean that the function x_n is an element of R). In such a case, is it permissible to replace the word "in" by the element symbol, or is this not accepted usage?

E.g. "Given a sequence {x_n} \in \mathbb{R}..." Is this OK?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org


I just had a quick flip through Rudin and I only ever saw "a sequence in \mathbb{R}".
 


Usually, the set of sequences which elements in a set A is denoted by A^{\mathbb N}.
More generally, if A and B are two sets, then the set of functions from A to B is written B^A.
 


imurme8 said:
It is well-known shorthand to say that a sequence of real numbers x_n is a sequence "in R". (Of course we do not mean that the function x_n is an element of R). In such a case, is it permissible to replace the word "in" by the element symbol, or is this not accepted usage?

E.g. "Given a sequence {x_n} \in \mathbb{R}..." Is this OK?

No, this is not permissible. This would be a serious abuse of notation and it would likely cause trouble.

One should say "Given a sequence (x_n)_n with each x_n\in \mathbb{R}".
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Back
Top