TA-ship into RA-ship - ettiquette of asking?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bjnartowt
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
A physics department TA is considering asking their research advisor about transitioning from a TA position to a research assistant (RA) role, particularly since two classmates have made this switch in the context of a strong emphasis on experimental particle physics at their school. The TA is concerned about their preparedness for the research required by their advisor, who specializes in theoretical particle physics, a less prominent area at the institution. The discussion highlights the financial implications of RA positions, suggesting that the advisor may not have the funds or may not prioritize this transition yet. It is advised that the TA inquire about the possibility of switching roles during their next meeting with the advisor to clarify their options. Additionally, there is a recommendation to address any gaps in knowledge or coursework early on to avoid complications later in their academic career, such as during candidacy examinations or defenses.
bjnartowt
Messages
265
Reaction score
3
Hi all, I'm a TA at my physics department, and I've seen two of my classmates be freed of their TA-duties to be RA instead. They are experimental particle physics people. Experimental particle physics is big at our school. I am theoretical particle physics. Theoretical particle physics is not big at our school: only my research-advisor is into it.

Speaking of my research advisor: the stuff I'm supposed to know to do research for him is totally beyond me.

In that light: is it improper ettiquette to ask my research-advisor if he can devote funds to me so that I can be an RA instead of a TA? What's the proper way to go about these things?

BJN
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I wouldn't ask.

You've already caught on to the fact that RA-ships cost your advisor money. He either doesn't have it, or doesn't want to spend it on you yet - your second paragraph may provide some explanation.
 
I don't see how there's any harm in asking. The next time you meet with him, just tell him that you're curious if switching from a TA to an RA is an option for you. Different departments have different rules and defaults about who will do what and when. Then at least you'll know where you stand.

As for the second point, this is something that needs to be addressed - and the sooner the better. You don't want that to come to light for the first time in your candidacy examination or your defence. You need to figure out if there is an extra course that you need to take (even at the senior undergrad level if necessary), or if you're doing enough background reading, and if your background reading is appropriate for your topic.
 
I don't know if I actually know of a theoretical physics grad student in my university's physics department that is supported by an RA.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
Back
Top