Taking the natural logarithm of e^(2i*pi)

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter rustynail
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Logarithm Natural
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the application of DeMoivre's formula and the properties of logarithms in complex analysis. The user initially believes that taking the natural logarithm of e^(2iπ) should yield 2iπ = 0, which is incorrect. Instead, the correct interpretation is that ln[e^(2iπ)] simplifies to log[e^(2iπ)] = 0, as e^(2iπ) equals 1. This highlights the importance of understanding the periodic nature of complex exponentials and logarithmic identities.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of complex numbers and Euler's formula
  • Familiarity with logarithmic identities in complex analysis
  • Knowledge of DeMoivre's theorem
  • Basic proficiency in using mathematical software like Wolfram Alpha
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of complex logarithms and their periodicity
  • Explore Euler's formula and its applications in complex analysis
  • Learn about the implications of DeMoivre's theorem in trigonometry
  • Practice using Wolfram Alpha for complex number calculations
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physics students, and anyone interested in complex analysis and logarithmic functions will benefit from this discussion.

rustynail
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I was playing around with DeMoivre's formula

ei*pi = -1

and there is something I don't quite understand about taking the natural logarithm of a certain expression. I though that

e2i*pi = 1

ln[e2i*pi] = ln (1),

but this yields to an imposibility

2i*pi = 0.

So obviously I am doing something wrong, and when I input ln[e^(2i*pi)] into Wolfram, it gives log[e2i*pi]=0.

Can anyone explain why Wolfram Alpha translates ln[e^(2i*pi)] to log[e2i*pi]=0, and why that second expression is true?

Thank you in advance for your time.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=637214 It says micromass but it was really me...>.> ok it was micromass
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Great, I appreciate, thank you!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
70K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K