Taking the natural logarithm of e^(2i*pi)

  • Thread starter Thread starter rustynail
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Logarithm Natural
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the confusion regarding the natural logarithm of the expression e^(2i*pi). It highlights that while e^(2i*pi) equals 1, taking the natural logarithm leads to the incorrect conclusion that 2i*pi equals 0. The key point is that the logarithm of a complex number can have multiple values due to the periodic nature of the complex exponential function. Wolfram Alpha correctly simplifies ln[e^(2i*pi)] to log[e^(2i*pi)]=0, acknowledging that the logarithm of 1 is indeed 0, but also that the argument can yield other values based on its periodicity. Understanding the properties of complex logarithms clarifies this apparent contradiction.
rustynail
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I was playing around with DeMoivre's formula

ei*pi = -1

and there is something I don't quite understand about taking the natural logarithm of a certain expression. I though that

e2i*pi = 1

ln[e2i*pi] = ln (1),

but this yields to an imposibility

2i*pi = 0.

So obviously I am doing something wrong, and when I input ln[e^(2i*pi)] into Wolfram, it gives log[e2i*pi]=0.

Can anyone explain why Wolfram Alpha translates ln[e^(2i*pi)] to log[e2i*pi]=0, and why that second expression is true?

Thank you in advance for your time.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=637214 It says micromass but it was really me...>.> ok it was micromass
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Great, I appreciate, thank you!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top