Tangential force unit conversion

AI Thread Summary
To convert Newtons to Pascals, divide the force in Newtons by the area in square meters, as a Pascal is defined as one Newton per square meter. The discussion clarifies that the same calculus applies when calculating the force exerted by a gas compared to a solid object. The conversion process remains consistent regardless of the material type. Understanding these principles is essential for accurate calculations in physics. Overall, the thread emphasizes the relationship between force, area, and pressure units.
Crazymechanic
Messages
831
Reaction score
12
Hi , if we have a rotating centrifuge at rpm "a" and we have the radius "b" of the centrifuge and then at the side i have a metal ball that weight's "c" I take the formula which you suggested me here F=ma where a=v2/r and out of that I get Newtons, how do i convert them to like pascals? Because i read that somewhere they use Newtons/square meter somewhere Newtons/square millimeter and that confuses me.

And would the calculus be different if i wanted to find out how much force on the side is exerted by a gas let's say than a solid like in this case a solid object?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Crazymechanic! :smile:
Crazymechanic said:
… I get Newtons, how do i convert them to like pascals? Because i read that somewhere they use Newtons/square meter somewhere Newtons/square millimeter and that confuses me.

A Pascal is a Newton per square metre …

it's the SI unit "derived" from the base units of Newton and metre, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SI_derived_unit :wink:
And would the calculus be different if i wanted to find out how much force on the side is exerted by a gas let's say than a solid like in this case a solid object?

Exactly the same. :smile:
 
Thanks Tim:)
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
I am attempting to use a Raman TruScan with a 785 nm laser to read a material for identification purposes. The material causes too much fluorescence and doesn’t not produce a good signal. However another lab is able to produce a good signal consistently using the same Raman model and sample material. What would be the reason for the different results between instruments?
Back
Top