Find Tangential Velocity of Star: "k" Conversion Factor Explained

AI Thread Summary
To find the tangential velocity of a star, the formula Vt = μ × d is used, where Vt is the tangential velocity, μ is the proper motion in radians per second, and d is the distance in meters. The proper motion must be converted from arcseconds per year to radians per second, which requires knowing the conversion factors for these units. The discussion highlights the importance of accurately converting these values and understanding the role of the conversion factor "k" in the formula for tangential velocity. Additionally, it emphasizes the need for a systematic approach to unit conversion for accurate results. Proper conversion is crucial for determining the star's tangential velocity correctly.
JoAstro
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I am trying to find the tangential velocity of a star but I am confused with the whole procedure.

Homework Equations


[/B]
They give me the following data:
⋅Distance: 32parsecs
⋅μ: 0.24 arc seconds per year

I have a section explaining proper motion that states the following formula:

Vt= μ⋅d
where Vt is the tangential velocity expressed in SI units, μ the proper motion in arc seconds per year expressed in radiants per second, and d the distance expressed in SI units.

The Attempt at a Solution



d= 32pc = 9.87×1017metres
μ= 0.24 = 1.16×10-16rad/s
(I used google to convert these values)

Thus,

Vt = μ⋅d = (1.16×10-16 rad/s) × (9.87×1017 m.)
Vt = 114.49 m/s

But I am not 100% sure with my method and therefore my final result.

Then, I decided to read a little further and I stumbled upon a website that explained the tangential velocity in a more "complete" or rather different way. It said:

***To get the tangential velocity, you need to first measure the angular velocity of the star across the sky (d[PLAIN]http://www.astronomynotes.com/starprop/theta.gif/[I]dt[/I]). This is how many degrees on the sky the star moves in a given amount of time and is called the proper motion by astronomers. If you determine the star's distance from its trigonometric parallax or the inverse square law method, you can convert the angular velocity (proper motion) to tangential velocity in physical units such as kilometers/second. The tangential velocity = k × the star's distance × the proper motion, where k is a conversion factor that will take care of the conversion from arc seconds and parsecs and years to kilometers/second. Using the Pythagorean theorem for right triangles, you find that the star's total velocity = Sqrt[(radial velocity)2 + (tangential velocity)2].

My question is, what is that "k" they mention being the conversion factor?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
JoAstro said:
μ= 0.24 = 1.16×10-16rad/s
This is not correct. Note that μ is given in arcseconds per year. Also, make sure you are converting arcseconds to radians correctly.
 
TSny, thanks for pointing that out.

I used google as I don't know a way to go at it. May I ask if you know how to convert these values? :)
 
You must have misread the 10-16 factor when using Google.

To do the conversion yourself, you will need to know how many radians are in one arcsecond (or vice versa) and you will need to know how many seconds are in a year. Then use a standard systematic method to convert arcseconds/year to radians/second. If you need a refresher on converting units, try https://www.mathsisfun.com/measure/unit-conversion-method.html or search for some other sites.
 
Definitely need that refresh!

Thank you :)
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
12K
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Back
Top