Tangents to parametric equations

nomadreid
Gold Member
Messages
1,748
Reaction score
243
The site http://tutorial.math.lamar.edu/Classes/CalcII/TangentNormalVectors.aspx talks of "the" unit tangent vector of r(t) = f(t)*i(t)+g(t)*j(t)+h(t)*k(t) as finding "the" tangent vector r'(t) = f'(t)*i(t)+g'(t)*j(t)+h'(t)*k(t) and normalizing it, and further with finding "the" tangent line at t=t0 as r(t0) + r'(t0)*t . (If I got that right.) But if one thinks of a tangent line as a line being perpendicular to the curve at the given point, then there are an infinite number of tangent lines (and unit tangent vectors), which is, as I understand it, the reason one deals with tangent planes in respect to curves in 3-D instead of tangent lines. What am I missing here?
 
  • Like
Likes Dr. Courtney
Mathematics news on Phys.org
nomadreid said:
The site http://tutorial.math.lamar.edu/Classes/CalcII/TangentNormalVectors.aspx talks of "the" unit tangent vector of r(t) = f(t)*i(t)+g(t)*j(t)+h(t)*k(t) as finding "the" tangent vector r'(t) = f'(t)*i(t)+g'(t)*j(t)+h'(t)*k(t) and normalizing it, and further with finding "the" tangent line at t=t0 as r(t0) + r'(t0)*t . (If I got that right.) But if one thinks of a tangent line as a line being perpendicular to the curve at the given point, then there are an infinite number of tangent lines (and unit tangent vectors), which is, as I understand it, the reason one deals with tangent planes in respect to curves in 3-D instead of tangent lines. What am I missing here?
For your curve in space r(t) = f(t)i + g(t)j + h(t)k, at a given point on the curve P(x0, y0, z0), the tangent plane contains an infinite number of lines that lie in the plane and intersect the given point. However, there is only one line in this plane that has the same direction as the curve, and that's the one they're talking about in the tutorial. The unit tangent is a unit vector in that direction.
 
  • Like
Likes nomadreid
Ah, that makes sense. Thanks very much, Mark44
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top