Technical question about Nikolic' Quantum Myths

  • Thread starter Thread starter birulami
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Myths Quantum
birulami
Messages
153
Reaction score
0
I am referring to the http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0609163" discussed at length in other threads with a purely technical question to help me understand more of the paper.

On page 12, formula 26 defines the norm of a vector as

\langle\psi|\psi\rangle = \psi_1^*\psi_1 + \psi_2^*\psi_2 .

My question is: isn't there a square root missing to get a norm. When I look up my lecture notes on functional analysis, a norm on a Hilbert space is defined by

||f|| = \sqrt{(f,f)}

where (\cdot,\cdot) is the scalar product. If the above formula 26 would nevertheless be correct, I would end up with a scalar product with a square in, which is not linear and therefore not a scalar product.

What am I confusing here?

Thanks,
Harald.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Square root is indeed missing. Or he meant to write norm squared.
 
lbrits said:
Or he meant to write norm squared.
Yes he did. :wink:

Even the the mass squared is sometimes called mass by physicists, especially relativists. :smile:
 
technical question about Nikolic' Quantum Myths (2nd round)

Thanks for the answers so far. Reading on in http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0609163" , I next stumble over formula 28. There I get

p_1=|\langle \phi_1|\psi\rangle|^2 = |\sqrt{1^*\psi_1 + 0\psi_2}|^2 = |\sqrt{\psi_1}|^2 = <br /> |\psi_1| = \sqrt{\psi_1^*\psi_1} .

This, however, contradicts the equation in the paragraph before formula 24, where it reads p_1 = \psi_1^*\psi_1.

My question is, whether formula 28 should rather start with \sqrt{p_1} or whether actually it should read p_1 = \sqrt{\psi_1^*\psi1} in the paragraph before 24?

Thanks,
Harald
 
Last edited by a moderator:
birulami said:
<br /> |\langle \phi_1|\psi\rangle|^2 = |\sqrt{1^*\psi_1 + 0\psi_2}|^2 <br />
This is wrong. The correct statement is
<br /> |\langle \phi_1|\psi\rangle|^2 = |1^*\psi_1 + 0\psi_2|^2 <br />
To repeat, <a|a> denotes the norm SQUARED.
 
Demystifier said:
This is wrong. The correct statement is
<br /> |\langle \phi_1|\psi\rangle|^2 = |1^*\psi_1 + 0\psi_2|^2 <br />
To repeat, <a|a> denotes the norm SQUARED.

Arrrgh, this missing square of the norm got me all messed up. I should have read my own initial post:confused:.

Thanks for getting me back on the right track.
Harald.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Back
Top