Tedious Simplification: Show expression is real

  • Thread starter Thread starter JolleJ
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Expression
JolleJ
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
After doing A LOT of simplification on a complicated expression I am now at a point where my own skills can't take me any further.

My problem is that I have an expression, which I am almost certain must be real, but it contains the imaginary units here and there. I have tried using Maple and Mathematica with different assumptions, but it does not simplify very much.

Now, I do not expect you to do my tedious algebra. However, I was hoping that one of you might know of a technique (in Maple/Mathematica/Hand) that could help me?

My expression is this:

{\frac {\sqrt [3]{2}n \left( -1+n \right) \left( -1+2\,n \right) <br /> \left( 2\,\sqrt [3]{-2}+4\,\sqrt [3]{-2} \left( -1+n \right) n+<br /> \left( -1-2\,n \left( 1+ \left( -3+n \right) n \right) +i\sqrt {1-16<br /> \,n+44\,{n}^{2}-44\,{n}^{3}+28\,{n}^{4}-24\,{n}^{5}+12\,{n}^{6}}<br /> \right) ^{2/3}-i\sqrt {3} \left( -1-2\,n \left( 1+ \left( -3+n<br /> \right) n \right) +i\sqrt {1-16\,n+44\,{n}^{2}-44\,{n}^{3}+28\,{n}^{4<br /> }-24\,{n}^{5}+12\,{n}^{6}} \right) ^{2/3} \right) }{\sqrt [3]{-1-2\,n<br /> \left( 1+ \left( -3+n \right) n \right) +i\sqrt {1-16\,n+44\,{n}^{2}-<br /> 44\,{n}^{3}+28\,{n}^{4}-24\,{n}^{5}+12\,{n}^{6}}} \left( -8+16\,n<br /> \right) }}
where n is an interger larger than 1.

as you can see the same terms appear many places.Any help will be greatly appreciated.

Maple format:
Code:
2^(1/3)*n*(-1+n)*(-1+2*n)*(2*(-2)^(1/3)+4*(-2)^(1/3)*(-1+n)*n+(-1-2*n*(1+(-3+n)*n)+I*sqrt(1-16*n+44*n^2-44*n^3+28*n^4-24*n^5+12*n^6))^(2/3)-I*sqrt(3)*(-1-2*n*(1+(-3+n)*n)+I*sqrt(1-16*n+44*n^2-44*n^3+28*n^4-24*n^5+12*n^6))^(2/3))/((-1-2*n*(1+(-3+n)*n)+I*sqrt(1-16*n+44*n^2-44*n^3+28*n^4-24*n^5+12*n^6))^(1/3)*(-8+16*n))

Mathematica format:
Code:
(2^(1/3) (-1 + n) n (-1 + 2 n) (2 (-2)^(1/3) + 
     4 (-2)^(1/3) (-1 + n) n + (-1 - 2 n (1 + (-3 + n) n) + 
       I Sqrt[1 - 16 n + 44 n^2 - 44 n^3 + 28 n^4 - 24 n^5 + 
         12 n^6])^(2/3) - 
     I Sqrt[3] (-1 - 2 n (1 + (-3 + n) n) + 
        I Sqrt[1 - 16 n + 44 n^2 - 44 n^3 + 28 n^4 - 24 n^5 + 
          12 n^6])^(2/3)))/((-8 + 16 n) (-1 - 2 n (1 + (-3 + n) n) + 
     I Sqrt[1 - 16 n + 44 n^2 - 44 n^3 + 28 n^4 - 24 n^5 + 12 n^6])^(
   1/3))

Thanks in advance
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Here's one idea:

If the number is pure real, then you can multiply the i's by -1 and after this, you should have the same number as before.
 
Thanks. Yes, that is a good idea. However, the expression is so complicated that it doesn't really help. I can't show the expressions are the same.

And actually, which I should have clarified, I do need the simplified expression.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Back
Top