Television as a Parental Substitute and Freud

  • Thread starter Mickey
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Television
In summary, the conversation discusses the role of television in modern society, particularly as a substitute for parental figures. This concept is compared to Freud's theory of children's first sexual attraction being towards the opposite sex parent. The conversation delves into the idea that with the rise of technology and mass media, children are now exposed to sexual desires from various sources, potentially impacting their early development. It also touches on the idea that modern parenting styles and societal changes may have led to a shift in the way children develop and repress their sexual desires.
  • #1
Mickey
163
0
Homer Simpson said:
Television! Teacher! Mother! Secret lover.
If you don't remember that Simpson's episode, Homer lowers his voice and hushes semi-erotically when he says the words "secret lover," while cradling a portable television. The first time I saw this, the Freudian connection escaped me. I was too disturbed by it for the obvious reasons and didn't feel the need to search for a deeper disturbance. :smile:

However, the fact is out there in plain sight that television has, for at least a generation now, performed temporary roles as a parental substitute for children. It differs in the extent of this role considerably between families, depending on already existing parenting styles. All of us now have likely learned something from television that other people once learned from their parents, especially in the time of Freud.

What does this have to do with Freud? He believed that every child will develop their first sexual attraction to the parent of opposite sex and ambivalence to the parent of the same sex. It's seems palpably ridiculous to me, as it probably does to many others. Such a theory, if presented today, would fall flat on its face, I'd think. Why was it so revolutionary back then?

I wonder if it's because parents are not what they used to be. Many of us by now didn't exactly have parents that played active roles as parental figures. They may have been too busy in the modern industrial rat race at work, and too stressed by work, becoming emotionally distant. Most young men now have had mothers who did not stay at home to take care of children, which was common during the time of Freud. And because there are parental substitutes, all the way from school teachers to mass media. Perhaps children in the second half of the 20th century never even had the opportunity to develop sexual attractions to their opposite parent, much less repress them.

Freud developed this theory after he examined his dreams for four years, after his father died. He dreamt of his mother about a time when he was in cramped quarters with her on a train. He supposes that he must have seen her undressing, instilling in him erotic feelings. Freud's experience seems entirely alien to me.

Then, I remembered my first memory of an erotic experience. I was watching television! :shy: It was some prime time soap opera kind of thing. I had never seen anything like it. The two individuals were so aggressive, rolling around the room, they caused expensive glass furniture to fall and break. They had no parents to yell at them for breaking the furniture, so it seemed like idyllic fun.

Here is where I understand Freud, now, because I can see how I would be affected by the repression of desires stemming from these early experiences. There was a modern mythology of "independent and affluent adult play" that I wanted to be a part of, but that desire had to be repressed, much like how the classical Oedipus mythology of Freud's attraction to his mother had to be repressed. Instead of from mother, my repressed childhood sexual desires stemmed from images on television and the 80s cultural mythos.

In Freud's time, there were no means to massively distribute sexual desire to children. So, it follows that children would first manifest sexual desire for whoever is closest to them from the opposite sex. However, now that there are such widespread means, children can be instilled with sexual desire from just about any source, on top of the fact that parents are more distant.

What are the implications of this postmodern interpretation of Freud? It can provide a lot of speculation. Maybe certain technologies would not have flourished without the repressed sexual desires that many young people had for mass media and its ability to deliver eroticism.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Hi there, Would a new one like me be welcome here?
Thanks so much in deed.http://simulationpretpersonnel.com
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #3
Maybe the rise of individualism and consumerism can be traced back to the repressed desires of children who were raised by television. Maybe the increasing distance between parents and children can be attributed to the rise of technology and its ability to provide a substitute for parental guidance and affection.

However, as a scientist, it is important to note that this is all just speculation and there is no concrete evidence to support these claims. Freud's theories, while revolutionary at the time, have been heavily criticized and challenged by modern psychology and neuroscience. While it is interesting to explore the potential effects of television as a parental substitute, it is important to approach these ideas with caution and continue to conduct research and gather evidence to support or refute them.
 

Related to Television as a Parental Substitute and Freud

1. How does television act as a parental substitute?

Television can act as a parental substitute by providing children with a sense of companionship, guidance, and authority. It can also serve as a source of comfort and entertainment, just like a parent would.

2. What impact does television as a parental substitute have on a child's development?

The impact of television as a parental substitute on a child's development is still a topic of debate. Some studies suggest that excessive television viewing can lead to a lack of social skills, attention problems, and poor academic performance. However, other studies argue that television can also provide educational and positive influences on a child's development.

3. How does Freud's theory tie into the concept of television as a parental substitute?

Freud's theory of the Oedipus complex suggests that children have a deep desire for their parent of the opposite sex and see their same-sex parent as a rival. Television can serve as a substitute for this desire, as children may become attached to certain TV characters or personalities and see them as a parental figure.

4. Can television really fulfill the role of a parent?

No, television cannot fully fulfill the role of a parent. While it can provide temporary comfort and guidance, it lacks the emotional connection and physical presence that a parent provides. Additionally, television may not always provide appropriate or accurate information, unlike a parent who can tailor their guidance to their child's specific needs.

5. How can parents limit the negative effects of television as a parental substitute?

Parents can limit the negative effects of television as a parental substitute by monitoring their child's television viewing habits and setting limits on screen time. They can also encourage their child to engage in other activities and spend quality time together as a family. Additionally, parents can discuss the content of the television shows with their child and provide guidance and clarification when needed.

Similar threads

  • General Discussion
Replies
3
Views
857
Replies
29
Views
6K
  • General Discussion
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • General Discussion
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • General Discussion
Replies
9
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • General Discussion
Replies
28
Views
6K
  • Art, Music, History, and Linguistics
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
103
Views
13K
  • General Discussion
Replies
29
Views
4K
Back
Top