Temperature Dependence of Donor Ionization Energies

Lacan
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Donor ionization energies are calculated via the hydrogen-like model and use the static dielectric constant and effective mass to modify the screening between the electron and the donor. Nice and simple, I get it. But in a material the ionized electron needs to go someplace - presumably the bottom states of the conduction band. Given this, does the temperature dependence of the conduction band's bandwidth affect the donor ionization energy?

If so, I can see how this effect would may be small enough to be ignored when the saturation temperature is low (donor ionization energy is small and the concentration of donors is small), but what about when one is closer to the degenerate regime in a material doped with deep donors? In other words, what if the saturation temperature doesn't occur until, say, 1000K+? Does anyone have any examples of when the donor ionization energy get convoluted with the Varshni equation (if that occurs)?

Thanks!
~Lacan
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Regardless of the changes in the band gap, temperature will certainly change the vibrational free energy of the lattice surrounding the dopant which can change the ionization "free" energy. In many applications this change is neglected. But there is still on going research to compute the temperature effect on dopants in semiconductors starting from quantum mechanical considerations. I think you could also find some simple formulations in literature based on Debye model for lattice vibrations.
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top