Temperature of Space: Atomic/Molecular Motion & Equilibria

  • Thread starter Thread starter Frank Peters
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Space Temperature
AI Thread Summary
Temperature is defined as atomic and molecular motion, with planetary surface temperatures, like those of the lunar surface, reflecting equilibrium states between absorbed solar radiation and heat loss. The quoted temperatures for the moon, which range from -200 F to +200 F, refer to the ground surface layer in equilibrium with solar exposure. In interplanetary space, the Cosmic Microwave Background radiation at 2.7K suggests that objects can reach thermal equilibrium with this radiation. Despite the perception of interstellar space as an infinite heat sink, spacecraft like the Voyager probes maintain functionality due to onboard Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generators (RTGs) that provide necessary heat and power. Overall, temperature applies to all states of matter, including solids, which exhibit molecular motion.
Frank Peters
Messages
28
Reaction score
2
Temperature is atomic/molecular motion.

However, the temperature of planetary surfaces without an atmosphere are often quoted. For example, the temperature of the lunar surface ranges from about -200 F to +200 F depending on whether or not the surface is exposed to the sun or is in shadow.

But the moon has no atmosphere so then to what do these temperatures refer?

Are they the temperature of the actual ground surface layer in equilibium with solar radiation? That is, the gound surface layer absobs solar radiation and is heated but also loses heat through radiation back to space and conduction to lower layers. Eventually an equilibrium is reached. Is this the lunar temperature in daylight?

Also, putting quantum theories of the vacuum aside, can we talk about the temperature of interplanetary space? Or can we only describe a similar equilibrium phenomenon when a spacecraft is traveling through interplanetary space?

It would seem to me that interstellar space would be close to an infinite heat sink, as any object within it would radiate away all heat. Yet the voyager probes are still functioning.
 
Science news on Phys.org
Frank Peters said:
Temperature is atomic/molecular motion.

However, the temperature of planetary surfaces without an atmosphere are often quoted. For example, the temperature of the lunar surface ranges from about -200 F to +200 F depending on whether or not the surface is exposed to the sun or is in shadow.

But the moon has no atmosphere so then to what do these temperatures refer?

Are they the temperature of the actual ground surface layer in equilibium with solar radiation? That is, the gound surface layer absobs solar radiation and is heated but also loses heat through radiation back to space and conduction to lower layers. Eventually an equilibrium is reached. Is this the lunar temperature in daylight?

The temperatures refer to the temperature of the lunar surface.

Also, putting quantum theories of the vacuum aside, can we talk about the temperature of interplanetary space? Or can we only describe a similar equilibrium phenomenon when a spacecraft is traveling through interplanetary space?

"Empty" space is filled with the Cosmic Microwave Background radiation (CMB), which has a temperature of 2.7K. So an object in interstellar space shielded from any stellar radiation should come into equilibrium with this radiation.

It would seem to me that interstellar space would be close to an infinite heat sink, as any object within it would radiate away all heat. Yet the voyager probes are still functioning.

The Voyager probes have their own onboard energy sources. These are Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generators. (RTGs). This heat keeps the probes warm enough so that they are still functioning. They are still generating significant power. This is what Wikipedia has to say on that:

"One example is the RTG used by the Voyager probes. In the year 2000, 23 years after production, the radioactive material inside the RTG had decreased in power by 16.6%, i.e. providing 83.4% of its initial output; starting with a capacity of 470 W, after this length of time it would have a capacity of only 392 W. A related loss of power in the Voyager RTGs is the degrading properties of the bi-metallic thermocouples used to convert thermal energy into electrical energy; the RTGs were working at about 67% of their total original capacity instead of the expected 83.4%. By the beginning of 2001, the power generated by the Voyager RTGs had dropped to 315 W for Voyager 1 and to 319 W for Voyager 2."
 
Frank Peters said:
Temperature is atomic/molecular motion.

It sounds like you think that it takes gas or liquid to have motion.

Solids have temperatures too. You only need to touch a hot stove or a block of ice to know that.
The thermal motion of a solid's molecules can be compared to vibrations.
 
Frank Peters said:
However, the temperature of planetary surfaces...

But the moon has no atmosphere so then to what do these temperatures refer?
Your premise is the answer to your question!
Yet the voyager probes are still functioning.
What does that have to do with your question?
 
  • Like
Likes sophiecentaur
I need to calculate the amount of water condensed from a DX cooling coil per hour given the size of the expansion coil (the total condensing surface area), the incoming air temperature, the amount of air flow from the fan, the BTU capacity of the compressor and the incoming air humidity. There are lots of condenser calculators around but they all need the air flow and incoming and outgoing humidity and then give a total volume of condensed water but I need more than that. The size of the...
Thread 'Why work is PdV and not (P+dP)dV in an isothermal process?'
Let's say we have a cylinder of volume V1 with a frictionless movable piston and some gas trapped inside with pressure P1 and temperature T1. On top of the piston lay some small pebbles that add weight and essentially create the pressure P1. Also the system is inside a reservoir of water that keeps its temperature constant at T1. The system is in equilibrium at V1, P1, T1. Now let's say i put another very small pebble on top of the piston (0,00001kg) and after some seconds the system...
Back
Top